Frank Chance vs Jimmie Foxx: Career Stats Comparison
Jimmie Foxx has the better career line of the two, leading 13 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Frank Chance played 1898–1914 as a hitter; Jimmie Foxx played 1925–1945 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Frank Chance (1898–1914) and Jimmie Foxx (1925–1945) — they broke in during the 1890s and the 1920s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Frank Chance finished with 1,274 hits and 20 home runs; Jimmie Foxx finished with 2,646 hits and 534 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Jimmie Foxx, with 534 to Frank Chance's 20.
- Who had the higher OPS? Jimmie Foxx, with 1.038 to Frank Chance's .788.
- Who had the higher batting average? Jimmie Foxx, with .325 to Frank Chance's .296.
- Who had more hits? Jimmie Foxx, with 2,646 to Frank Chance's 1,274.
- Who drove in more runs? Jimmie Foxx, with 1,922 to Frank Chance's 596.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Jimmie Foxx, with 72,872 career PIV to Frank Chance's 20,186.
- Who won more championships? Both — each won 2 World Series titles.
Frank Chance
Jimmie Foxx
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Frank Chance and Jimmie Foxx. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1890s and the 1920s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Frank Chance | Jimmie Foxx |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,288 | Leads: 2,317 |
| At-Bats | 4,299 | Leads: 8,134 |
| Runs | 798 | Leads: 1,751 |
| Hits | 1,274 | Leads: 2,646 |
| Doubles | 200 | Leads: 458 |
| Triples | 79 | Leads: 125 |
| Home Runs | 20 | Leads: 534 |
| RBI | 596 | Leads: 1,922 |
| Walks | 556 | Leads: 1,452 |
| Strikeouts not scored | 320 | 1,311 |
| Stolen Bases | Leads: 403 | 87 |
| Batting Avg | .296 | Leads: .325 |
| On-Base % | .394 | Leads: .428 |
| Slugging % | .394 | Leads: .609 |
| OPS | .788 | Leads: 1.038 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Jimmie Foxx outpaces Frank Chance 72,872 to 20,186 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 3,470 PIV per season to 1,187, across 21 seasons to 17. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Frank Chance — top 3 seasons by OPS
Jimmie Foxx — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Jimmie Foxx leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Frank Chance owns stolen bases. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Jimmie Foxx. PIV agrees: Jimmie Foxx grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the Frank Chance and Jimmie Foxx careers compare
No season is shared: Frank Chance played 1898–1914, Jimmie Foxx 1925–1945. Playing time explains much of the gap in the counting rows: Frank Chance appeared in 1,288 games to Jimmie Foxx's 2,317. The green cells for Frank Chance are stolen bases (403 to 87). At the plate, Frank Chance walked more often than struck out (556 walks, 320 strikeouts), and Jimmie Foxx walked more often than struck out (1,452 walks, 1,311 strikeouts). Home runs make up a larger share of Jimmie Foxx's hits: 20 of 1,274 for Frank Chance, 534 of 2,646 for Jimmie Foxx.
Frank Chance vs Jimmie Foxx: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Frank Chance or Jimmie Foxx?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Jimmie Foxx leads Frank Chance in 13 of the 14 scored categories.
- Did Frank Chance or Jimmie Foxx hit more home runs?
- Jimmie Foxx, with 534 to Frank Chance's 20.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Jimmie Foxx, with 1.038 to Frank Chance's .788.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Jimmie Foxx, with .325 to Frank Chance's .296.
- Who had more hits?
- Jimmie Foxx, with 2,646 to Frank Chance's 1,274.