Harlond Clift vs Stan Hack: Career Stats Comparison

Stan Hack has the better career line of the two, leading 10 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Harlond Clift played 1934–1945 as a hitter; Stan Hack played 1932–1947 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Harlond Clift (1934–1945) and Stan Hack (1932–1947) — both broke in during the 1930s, which makes the head-to-head feel like a contemporaries' debate. Harlond Clift finished with 1,558 hits and 178 home runs; Stan Hack finished with 2,193 hits and 57 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Harlond Clift, with 178 to Stan Hack's 57.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Harlond Clift, with .831 to Stan Hack's .791.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Stan Hack, with .301 to Harlond Clift's .272.
  • Who had more hits? Stan Hack, with 2,193 to Harlond Clift's 1,558.
  • Who drove in more runs? Harlond Clift, with 829 to Stan Hack's 642.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Harlond Clift, with 21,908 career PIV to Stan Hack's 19,618.
Leads Stan Hack 10 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Harlond Clift +2,290
Read the verdict ↓

Harlond Clift

Hitter · 1934–1945
Games
1,582
Hits
1,558
Home Runs
178
RBI
829
Avg
.272
OPS
.831
View Harlond Clift's full profile →

Stan Hack

Hitter · 1932–1947
Games
1,938
Hits
2,193
Home Runs
57
RBI
642
Avg
.301
OPS
.791
View Stan Hack's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Harlond Clift and Stan Hack. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Harlond Clift vs Stan Hack: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Harlond Clift Stan Hack
Games 1,582 Leads: 1,938
At-Bats 5,730 Leads: 7,278
Runs 1,070 Leads: 1,239
Hits 1,558 Leads: 2,193
Doubles 309 Leads: 363
Triples 62 Leads: 81
Home Runs Leads: 178 57
RBI Leads: 829 642
Walks 1,070 Leads: 1,092
Strikeouts not scored 713 466
Stolen Bases 69 Leads: 165
Batting Avg .272 Leads: .301
On-Base % .390 Leads: .394
Slugging % Leads: .441 .397
OPS Leads: .831 .791

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Harlond Clift leads Stan Hack 21,908 to 19,618 — driven by per-season impact — 1,685 PIV per season to 1,226 — rather than by longevity, since Harlond Clift played 13 seasons to Stan Hack's 16. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Harlond Clift
21,908
Career PIV · 1,685 per season (13 seasons)
Stan Hack
19,618
Career PIV · 1,226 per season (16 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Harlond Clift — top 3 seasons by OPS

1938.977 OPS34 HR, 118 RBI, .290 avg
1937.960 OPS29 HR, 118 RBI, .306 avg
1936.938 OPS20 HR, 73 RBI, .302 avg

Stan Hack — top 3 seasons by OPS

1941.844 OPS7 HR, 45 RBI, .317 avg
1938.843 OPS4 HR, 67 RBI, .320 avg
1935.842 OPS4 HR, 64 RBI, .311 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Stan Hack leads in hits, runs, stolen bases, and batting average, while Harlond Clift owns home runs, RBI, and OPS. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Stan Hack. Note that PIV actually grades Harlond Clift ahead, which means Stan Hack's edge is partly volume. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Harlond Clift and Stan Hack careers compare

The careers of Harlond Clift (1934–1945) and Stan Hack (1932–1947) overlapped from 1934 to 1945, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. With 1,582 games against 1,938 across 13 and 16 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. The green cells for Harlond Clift are home runs (178 to 57), RBI (829 to 642), and slugging percentage (.441 to .397). At the plate, Harlond Clift walked more often than struck out (1,070 walks, 713 strikeouts), and Stan Hack walked more often than struck out (1,092 walks, 466 strikeouts).

Harlond Clift vs Stan Hack: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Harlond Clift or Stan Hack?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Stan Hack leads Harlond Clift in 10 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Harlond Clift or Stan Hack hit more home runs?
Harlond Clift, with 178 to Stan Hack's 57.
Who had the higher OPS?
Harlond Clift, with .831 to Stan Hack's .791.
Who had the higher batting average?
Stan Hack, with .301 to Harlond Clift's .272.
Who had more hits?
Stan Hack, with 2,193 to Harlond Clift's 1,558.