Earle Combs vs Babe Ruth: Career Stats Comparison

Babe Ruth has the better career line of the two, leading 13 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Earle Combs played 1924–1935 as a hitter; Babe Ruth played 1914–1935 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Earle Combs (1924–1935) and Babe Ruth (1914–1935) — they broke in during the 1920s and the 1910s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Earle Combs finished with 1,866 hits and 58 home runs; Babe Ruth finished with 2,873 hits and 714 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Babe Ruth, with 714 to Earle Combs's 58.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Babe Ruth, with 1.164 to Earle Combs's .859.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Babe Ruth, with .342 to Earle Combs's .325.
  • Who had more hits? Babe Ruth, with 2,873 to Earle Combs's 1,866.
  • Who drove in more runs? Babe Ruth, with 2,217 to Earle Combs's 632.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Babe Ruth, with 111,979 career PIV to Earle Combs's 19,222.
  • Who won more championships? Babe Ruth, with 7 World Series titles to Earle Combs's 3.
Leads Babe Ruth 13 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Babe Ruth +92,756
Read the verdict ↓

Earle Combs

Hitter · 1924–1935
Games
1,455
Hits
1,866
Home Runs
58
RBI
632
Avg
.325
OPS
.859
View Earle Combs's full profile →

Babe Ruth

Hitter · 1914–1935
Games
2,503
Hits
2,873
Home Runs
714
RBI
2,217
Avg
.342
OPS
1.164
View Babe Ruth's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Earle Combs and Babe Ruth. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1920s and the 1910s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Earle Combs vs Babe Ruth: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Earle Combs Babe Ruth
Games 1,455 Leads: 2,503
At-Bats 5,746 Leads: 8,398
Runs 1,186 Leads: 2,174
Hits 1,866 Leads: 2,873
Doubles 309 Leads: 506
Triples Leads: 154 136
Home Runs 58 Leads: 714
RBI 632 Leads: 2,217
Walks 670 Leads: 2,062
Strikeouts not scored 278 1,330
Stolen Bases 96 Leads: 123
Batting Avg .325 Leads: .342
On-Base % .397 Leads: .474
Slugging % .462 Leads: .690
OPS .859 Leads: 1.164

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Babe Ruth outpaces Earle Combs 111,979 to 19,222 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 5,090 PIV per season to 1,602, across 22 seasons to 12. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Earle Combs
19,222
Career PIV · 1,602 per season (12 seasons)
Babe Ruth
111,979
Career PIV · 5,090 per season (22 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Earle Combs — top 3 seasons by OPS

1930.947 OPS7 HR, 82 RBI, .344 avg
1927.925 OPS6 HR, 64 RBI, .356 avg
1929.881 OPS3 HR, 65 RBI, .345 avg

Babe Ruth — top 3 seasons by OPS

19201.382 OPS54 HR, 137 RBI, .376 avg
19211.359 OPS59 HR, 171 RBI, .378 avg
19231.309 OPS41 HR, 131 RBI, .393 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Babe Ruth leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Earle Combs owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Babe Ruth. PIV agrees: Babe Ruth grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Earle Combs and Babe Ruth careers compare

The careers of Earle Combs (1924–1935) and Babe Ruth (1914–1935) overlapped from 1924 to 1935, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. Playing time explains much of the gap in the counting rows: Earle Combs appeared in 1,455 games to Babe Ruth's 2,503. The green cells for Earle Combs are triples (154 to 136). Earle Combs walked more often than struck out (670 walks, 278 strikeouts); Babe Ruth walked more often than struck out (2,062 walks, 1,330 strikeouts). Home runs make up a larger share of Babe Ruth's hits: 58 of 1,866 for Earle Combs, 714 of 2,873 for Babe Ruth.

Earle Combs vs Babe Ruth: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Earle Combs or Babe Ruth?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Babe Ruth leads Earle Combs in 13 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Earle Combs or Babe Ruth hit more home runs?
Babe Ruth, with 714 to Earle Combs's 58.
Who had the higher OPS?
Babe Ruth, with 1.164 to Earle Combs's .859.
Who had the higher batting average?
Babe Ruth, with .342 to Earle Combs's .325.
Who had more hits?
Babe Ruth, with 2,873 to Earle Combs's 1,866.

See These Players in Another Era