David Cone vs Jeff Nelson: Career Stats Comparison

David Cone (1986–2003) and Jeff Nelson (1992–2006) — breaking in during the 1980s and the 1990s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. David Cone compiled 194 wins and 2,668 strikeouts; Jeff Nelson put up 48 wins and 829 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

David Cone

Pitcher · 1986–2003
Wins
194
Losses
126
Strikeouts
2,668
ERA
3.46
WHIP
1.26
IP
2,898
View David Cone's full profile →

Jeff Nelson

Pitcher · 1992–2006
Wins
48
Losses
45
Strikeouts
829
ERA
3.41
WHIP
1.35
IP
784
View Jeff Nelson's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. For pitchers, lower ERA, WHIP, and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads.

Statistic David Cone Jeff Nelson
Wins 194 48
Losses 126 45
Games 450 798
Games Started 419 0
Complete Games 56 0
Shutouts 22 0
Saves 1 33
Strikeouts 2,668 829
Walks 1,137 428
Hits Allowed 2,504 633
Home Runs Allowed 258 55
Innings Pitched 2,898 784
ERA 3.46 3.41
WHIP 1.26 1.35
K/9 8.28 9.51
BB/9 3.53 4.91

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), David Cone outpaces Jeff Nelson 47,099 to 13,516 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (2,479 vs 845 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

David Cone
47,099
Career Pitcher PIV · 2,479 per season (19 seasons)
Jeff Nelson
13,516
Career Pitcher PIV · 845 per season (16 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

David Cone — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19882.22 ERA20-3, 213 K in 231 IP
19972.82 ERA12-6, 222 K in 195 IP
19922.88 ERA13-7, 214 K in 196 IP

Jeff Nelson — top 0 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, David Cone leads in wins, strikeouts, WHIP, and innings pitched, while Jeff Nelson owns ERA and K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to David Cone. PIV agrees: David Cone grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

See These Players in Another Era