George Davis vs Francisco Lindor: Career Stats Comparison

George Davis has the better career line of the two, leading 11 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). George Davis played 1890–1909 as a hitter; Francisco Lindor has played 2015–present as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

George Davis (1890–1909) and Francisco Lindor (2015–present) — they broke in during the 1890s and the 2010s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. George Davis finished with 2,665 hits and 73 home runs; Francisco Lindor has 1,758 hits and 300 home runs through October 6, 2026. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Francisco Lindor, with 300 to George Davis's 73.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Francisco Lindor, with .812 to George Davis's .767.
  • Who had the higher batting average? George Davis, with .295 to Francisco Lindor's .270.
  • Who had more hits? George Davis, with 2,665 to Francisco Lindor's 1,758.
  • Who drove in more runs? George Davis, with 1,440 to Francisco Lindor's 905.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? George Davis, with 21,250 career PIV to Francisco Lindor's 14,684.
  • Who won more championships? George Davis, with 1 World Series title to Francisco Lindor's 0.
Leads George Davis 11 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge George Davis +6,565
Read the verdict ↓

George Davis

Hitter · 1890–1909
Games
2,372
Hits
2,665
Home Runs
73
RBI
1,440
Avg
.295
OPS
.767
View George Davis's full profile →

Francisco Lindor

Hitter · 2015–present
Games
1,640
Hits
1,758
Home Runs
300
RBI
905
Avg
.270
OPS
.812
View Francisco Lindor's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for George Davis and Francisco Lindor. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1890s and the 2010s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Francisco Lindor is still active — his totals below are current through October 6, 2026.

George Davis vs Francisco Lindor: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic George Davis Francisco Lindor
Games Leads: 2,372 1,640
At-Bats Leads: 9,045 6,504
Runs Leads: 1,545 1,074
Hits Leads: 2,665 1,758
Doubles Leads: 453 351
Triples Leads: 163 30
Home Runs 73 Leads: 300
RBI Leads: 1,440 905
Walks Leads: 874 634
Strikeouts not scored 613 1,215
Stolen Bases Leads: 619 219
Batting Avg Leads: .295 .270
On-Base % Leads: .362 .340
Slugging % .405 Leads: .472
OPS .767 Leads: .812

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), George Davis outpaces Francisco Lindor 21,250 to 14,684 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: George Davis played 20 seasons to Francisco Lindor's 11, while Francisco Lindor carries the higher per-season figure (1,335 to 1,062). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

George Davis
21,250
Career PIV · 1,062 per season (20 seasons)
Francisco Lindor
14,684
Career PIV · 1,335 per season (11 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

George Davis — top 3 seasons by OPS

1894.976 OPS9 HR, 93 RBI, .352 avg
1893.964 OPS11 HR, 119 RBI, .355 avg
1897.918 OPS10 HR, 135 RBI, .353 avg

Francisco Lindor — top 3 seasons by OPS

2018.871 OPS38 HR, 92 RBI, .277 avg
2019.854 OPS32 HR, 74 RBI, .284 avg
2024.844 OPS33 HR, 91 RBI, .273 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, George Davis leads in hits, RBI, runs, and stolen bases, while Francisco Lindor owns home runs and OPS. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to George Davis. PIV agrees: George Davis grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the George Davis and Francisco Lindor careers compare

George Davis (1890–1909) was finished before Francisco Lindor (2015–present) arrived, so they never shared a league. The two careers are close in length, 2,372 games for George Davis and 1,640 for Francisco Lindor across 20 and 11 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Francisco Lindor's edges on the table are home runs (300 to 73), slugging percentage (.472 to .405), and OPS (.812 to .767). Plate discipline differs: George Davis walked more often than struck out (874 walks, 613 strikeouts), but Francisco Lindor struck out more than walked (1,215 to 634). Francisco Lindor's numbers are live and update with each game, so the comparison is a snapshot.

George Davis vs Francisco Lindor: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, George Davis or Francisco Lindor?
By the career statistics compared on this page, George Davis leads Francisco Lindor in 11 of the 14 scored categories.
Did George Davis or Francisco Lindor hit more home runs?
Francisco Lindor, with 300 to George Davis's 73.
Who had the higher OPS?
Francisco Lindor, with .812 to George Davis's .767.
Who had the higher batting average?
George Davis, with .295 to Francisco Lindor's .270.
Who had more hits?
George Davis, with 2,665 to Francisco Lindor's 1,758.