Andre Dawson vs Jim Rice: Career Stats Comparison

Andre Dawson has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Andre Dawson played 1976–1996 as a hitter; Jim Rice played 1974–1989 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Andre Dawson (1976–1996) and Jim Rice (1974–1989) — both broke in during the 1970s, which makes the head-to-head feel like a contemporaries' debate. Andre Dawson finished with 2,774 hits and 438 home runs; Jim Rice finished with 2,452 hits and 382 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Andre Dawson, with 438 to Jim Rice's 382.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Jim Rice, with .854 to Andre Dawson's .806.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Jim Rice, with .298 to Andre Dawson's .279.
  • Who had more hits? Andre Dawson, with 2,774 to Jim Rice's 2,452.
  • Who drove in more runs? Andre Dawson, with 1,591 to Jim Rice's 1,451.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Jim Rice, with 31,418 career PIV to Andre Dawson's 20,948.
Leads Andre Dawson 9 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Jim Rice +10,471
Read the verdict ↓

Andre Dawson

Hitter · 1976–1996
Games
2,627
Hits
2,774
Home Runs
438
RBI
1,591
Avg
.279
OPS
.806
View Andre Dawson's full profile →

Jim Rice

Hitter · 1974–1989
Games
2,089
Hits
2,452
Home Runs
382
RBI
1,451
Avg
.298
OPS
.854
View Jim Rice's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Andre Dawson and Jim Rice. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Andre Dawson vs Jim Rice: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Andre Dawson Jim Rice
Games Leads: 2,627 2,089
At-Bats Leads: 9,927 8,225
Runs Leads: 1,373 1,249
Hits Leads: 2,774 2,452
Doubles Leads: 503 373
Triples Leads: 98 79
Home Runs Leads: 438 382
RBI Leads: 1,591 1,451
Walks 589 Leads: 670
Strikeouts not scored 1,509 1,423
Stolen Bases Leads: 314 58
Batting Avg .279 Leads: .298
On-Base % .323 Leads: .352
Slugging % .482 Leads: .502
OPS .806 Leads: .854

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Jim Rice outpaces Andre Dawson 31,418 to 20,948 — driven by per-season impact — 1,964 PIV per season to 998 — rather than by longevity, since Jim Rice played 16 seasons to Andre Dawson's 21. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Andre Dawson
20,948
Career PIV · 998 per season (21 seasons)
Jim Rice
31,418
Career PIV · 1,964 per season (16 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Andre Dawson — top 3 seasons by OPS

1981.918 OPS24 HR, 64 RBI, .302 avg
1987.896 OPS49 HR, 137 RBI, .287 avg
1990.893 OPS27 HR, 100 RBI, .310 avg

Jim Rice — top 3 seasons by OPS

1979.977 OPS39 HR, 130 RBI, .325 avg
1978.970 OPS46 HR, 139 RBI, .315 avg
1977.969 OPS39 HR, 114 RBI, .320 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Andre Dawson leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Jim Rice owns batting average, OBP, and OPS. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Andre Dawson. Note that PIV actually grades Jim Rice ahead, which means Andre Dawson's edge is partly volume. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Andre Dawson and Jim Rice careers compare

Andre Dawson and Jim Rice were active at the same time between 1976 and 1989. The two careers are close in length, 2,627 games for Andre Dawson and 2,089 for Jim Rice across 21 and 16 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Andre Dawson struck out more than walked (1,509 to 589); Jim Rice struck out more than walked (1,423 to 670). On the bases, Andre Dawson stole more often per game played (314 steals in 2,627 games for Andre Dawson, 58 in 2,089 for Jim Rice).

Andre Dawson vs Jim Rice: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Andre Dawson or Jim Rice?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Andre Dawson leads Jim Rice in 9 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Andre Dawson or Jim Rice hit more home runs?
Andre Dawson, with 438 to Jim Rice's 382.
Who had the higher OPS?
Jim Rice, with .854 to Andre Dawson's .806.
Who had the higher batting average?
Jim Rice, with .298 to Andre Dawson's .279.
Who had more hits?
Andre Dawson, with 2,774 to Jim Rice's 2,452.