George Foster vs Tom Seaver: Career Stats Comparison

George Foster (1969–1986) and Tom Seaver (1967–1986) — both broke in during the 1960s, which makes the head-to-head feel like a contemporaries' debate. George Foster finished with 1,925 hits and 348 home runs; Tom Seaver finished with 202 hits and 12 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

George Foster

Hitter · 1969–1986
Games
1,977
Hits
1,925
Home Runs
348
RBI
1,239
Avg
.274
OPS
.818
View George Foster's full profile →

Tom Seaver

Two-Way Player · 1967–1986
Games
677
Hits
202
Home Runs
12
RBI
86
Avg
.154
OPS
.429
View Tom Seaver's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for George Foster and Tom Seaver. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity; the rate stats at the bottom are era-agnostic.

Statistic George Foster Tom Seaver
Games 1,977 677
At-Bats 7,023 1,315
Runs 986 99
Hits 1,925 202
Doubles 307 28
Triples 47 5
Home Runs 348 12
RBI 1,239 86
Walks 666 108
Strikeouts 1,419 485
Stolen Bases 51 4
Batting Avg .274 .154
On-Base % .338 .219
Slugging % .480 .210
OPS .818 .429

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), George Foster outpaces Tom Seaver 20,637 to -7,256 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (1,032 vs -330 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

George Foster
20,637
Career PIV · 1,032 per season (20 seasons)
Tom Seaver
-7,256
Career PIV · -330 per season (22 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

George Foster — top 3 seasons by OPS

19771.013 OPS52 HR, 149 RBI, .320 avg
1979.948 OPS30 HR, 98 RBI, .302 avg
1978.906 OPS40 HR, 120 RBI, .281 avg

Tom Seaver — top 0 seasons by OPS

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, George Foster leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Tom Seaver owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to George Foster. PIV agrees: George Foster grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

See These Players in Another Era