Tom Glavine vs Tim Hudson: Career Stats Comparison

Tom Glavine has the better career line of the two, leading 7 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Tom Glavine played 1987–2008 as a pitcher; Tim Hudson played 1999–2015 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Tom Glavine (1987–2008) and Tim Hudson (1999–2015) — breaking in during the 1980s and the 1990s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Tom Glavine finished with 305 wins and 2,607 strikeouts; Tim Hudson finished with 222 wins and 2,080 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Tim Hudson, with 3.49 to Tom Glavine's 3.54.
  • Who won more games? Tom Glavine, with 305 to Tim Hudson's 222.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Tom Glavine, with 2,607 to Tim Hudson's 2,080.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Tim Hudson, with 1.24 to Tom Glavine's 1.31.
  • Who pitched more innings? Tom Glavine, with 4,413.1 to Tim Hudson's 3,126.2.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Tom Glavine, with 25 to Tim Hudson's 13.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Tom Glavine, with 40,421 career Pitcher PIV to Tim Hudson's 40,402.
Leads Tom Glavine 7 of 12 scored categories (1 tied)
Pitcher PIV edge Tom Glavine +19
Read the verdict ↓

Tom Glavine

Pitcher · 1987–2008
Wins
305
Losses
203
Strikeouts
2,607
ERA
3.54
WHIP
1.31
IP
4,413.1
View Tom Glavine's full profile →

Tim Hudson

Pitcher · 1999–2015
Wins
222
Losses
133
Strikeouts
2,080
ERA
3.49
WHIP
1.24
IP
3,126.2
View Tim Hudson's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1980s and the 1990s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Tom Glavine vs Tim Hudson: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Tom Glavine Tim Hudson
Wins Leads: 305 222
Losses not scored 203 133
Games Leads: 682 482
Games Started Leads: 682 479
Complete Games Leads: 56 26
Shutouts Leads: 25 13
Saves 0 0
Strikeouts Leads: 2,607 2,080
Walks not scored 1,500 917
Hits Allowed not scored 4,298 2,957
Home Runs Allowed not scored 356 248
Innings Pitched Leads: 4,413.1 3,126.2
ERA 3.54 Leads: 3.49
WHIP 1.31 Leads: 1.24
K/9 5.32 Leads: 5.99
BB/9 3.06 Leads: 2.64

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Tom Glavine edges Tim Hudson 40,421 to 40,402 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: Tom Glavine played 22 seasons to Tim Hudson's 17, while Tim Hudson carries the higher per-season figure (2,377 to 1,837). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Tom Glavine
40,421
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,837 per season (22 seasons)
Tim Hudson
40,402
Career Pitcher PIV · 2,377 per season (17 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Tom Glavine — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19982.47 ERA20-6, 157 K in 229 IP
19912.55 ERA20-11, 192 K in 246 IP
19922.76 ERA20-8, 129 K in 225 IP

Tim Hudson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20032.70 ERA16-7, 162 K in 240 IP
20102.83 ERA17-9, 139 K in 228 IP
20022.98 ERA15-9, 152 K in 238 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Tom Glavine leads in wins, strikeouts, and innings pitched, while Tim Hudson owns ERA, WHIP, and K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Tom Glavine. PIV agrees: Tom Glavine grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Tom Glavine and Tim Hudson careers compare

From 1999 through 2008, Tom Glavine and Tim Hudson were in the majors together. The two careers are close in length, 682 games for Tom Glavine and 482 for Tim Hudson across 22 and 17 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Where Tim Hudson comes out ahead, it is in ERA (3.49 to 3.54), WHIP (1.24 to 1.31), and strikeouts per nine (5.99 to 5.32). By rate, Tom Glavine struck out 5.32 and walked 3.06 per nine innings; Tim Hudson struck out 5.99 and walked 2.64.

Tom Glavine vs Tim Hudson: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Tom Glavine or Tim Hudson?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Tom Glavine leads Tim Hudson in 7 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Tim Hudson, with 3.49 to Tom Glavine's 3.54.
Who won more games?
Tom Glavine, with 305 to Tim Hudson's 222.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Tom Glavine, with 2,607 to Tim Hudson's 2,080.
Who had the better WHIP?
Tim Hudson, with 1.24 to Tom Glavine's 1.31.

See These Players in Another Era