Amos Rusie vs Jesse Tannehill: Career Stats Comparison
Amos Rusie (1889–1901) and Jesse Tannehill (1894–1911) — breaking in during the 1880s and the 1890s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Amos Rusie compiled 246 wins and 1,950 strikeouts; Jesse Tannehill put up 197 wins and 944 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Amos Rusie
Jesse Tannehill
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. For pitchers, lower ERA, WHIP, and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads.
| Statistic | Amos Rusie | Jesse Tannehill |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 246 | 197 |
| Losses | 174 | 117 |
| Games | 463 | 359 |
| Games Started | 427 | 321 |
| Complete Games | 393 | 264 |
| Shutouts | 30 | 34 |
| Saves | 5 | 7 |
| Strikeouts | 1,950 | 944 |
| Walks | 1,707 | 478 |
| Hits Allowed | 3,389 | 2,794 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 75 | 40 |
| Innings Pitched | 3,778 | 2,759 |
| ERA | 3.07 | 2.80 |
| WHIP | 1.35 | 1.19 |
| K/9 | 4.64 | 3.08 |
| BB/9 | 4.07 | 1.56 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Amos Rusie outpaces Jesse Tannehill 43,707 to 30,039 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (4,371 vs 1,877 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Amos Rusie — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Jesse Tannehill — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Amos Rusie leads in wins, strikeouts, K/9, and innings pitched, while Jesse Tannehill owns ERA and WHIP. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Amos Rusie. PIV agrees: Amos Rusie grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.