Oscar Charleston vs Paul Waner: Career Stats Comparison

Paul Waner has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Oscar Charleston played ?–1941 as a hitter; Paul Waner played 1926–1945 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Oscar Charleston (?–1941) and Paul Waner (1926–1945) — their careers are worth a careful side-by-side. Oscar Charleston finished with 1,718 hits and 183 home runs; Paul Waner finished with 3,152 hits and 113 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Oscar Charleston, with 183 to Paul Waner's 113.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Oscar Charleston, with 1.005 to Paul Waner's .878.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Oscar Charleston, with .350 to Paul Waner's .333.
  • Who had more hits? Paul Waner, with 3,152 to Oscar Charleston's 1,718.
  • Who drove in more runs? Paul Waner, with 1,309 to Oscar Charleston's 1,139.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Paul Waner, with 40,296 career PIV to Oscar Charleston's 34,756.
Leads Paul Waner 8 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Paul Waner +5,540
Read the verdict ↓

Oscar Charleston

Hitter · ?–1941
Games
1,336
Hits
1,718
Home Runs
183
RBI
1,139
Avg
.350
OPS
1.005
View Oscar Charleston's full profile →

Paul Waner

Hitter · 1926–1945
Games
2,549
Hits
3,152
Home Runs
113
RBI
1,309
Avg
.333
OPS
.878
View Paul Waner's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Oscar Charleston and Paul Waner. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Oscar Charleston vs Paul Waner: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Oscar Charleston Paul Waner
Games 1,336 Leads: 2,549
At-Bats 4,903 Leads: 9,459
Runs 1,164 Leads: 1,627
Hits 1,718 Leads: 3,152
Doubles 329 Leads: 605
Triples 112 Leads: 191
Home Runs Leads: 183 113
RBI 1,139 Leads: 1,309
Walks 647 Leads: 1,091
Strikeouts not scored 29 376
Stolen Bases Leads: 311 104
Batting Avg Leads: .350 .333
On-Base % Leads: .430 .404
Slugging % Leads: .575 .473
OPS Leads: 1.005 .878

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Paul Waner leads Oscar Charleston 40,296 to 34,756 — driven by per-season impact — 1,832 PIV per season to 1,121 — rather than by longevity, since Paul Waner played 22 seasons to Oscar Charleston's 31. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Oscar Charleston
34,756
Career PIV · 1,121 per season (31 seasons)
Paul Waner
40,296
Career PIV · 1,832 per season (22 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Oscar Charleston — top 2 seasons by OPS

19221.122 OPS17 HR, 90 RBI, .381 avg
19231.043 OPS11 HR, 94 RBI, .364 avg

Paul Waner — top 3 seasons by OPS

1928.992 OPS6 HR, 86 RBI, .370 avg
1927.986 OPS9 HR, 131 RBI, .380 avg
1934.968 OPS14 HR, 90 RBI, .362 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Oscar Charleston leads in home runs, stolen bases, batting average, and OBP, while Paul Waner owns hits, RBI, and runs. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Oscar Charleston. Note that PIV actually grades Paul Waner ahead, which means Oscar Charleston's edge is partly volume. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Oscar Charleston and Paul Waner careers compare

The careers of Oscar Charleston (?–1941) and Paul Waner (1926–1945) overlapped from 1941 to 1941, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. The table compares 1,336 games of Oscar Charleston with 2,549 of Paul Waner across 31 and 22 PIV seasons; totals favor the longer career by default. Oscar Charleston walked more often than struck out (647 walks, 29 strikeouts); Paul Waner walked more often than struck out (1,091 walks, 376 strikeouts). Home runs make up a larger share of Oscar Charleston's hits: 183 of 1,718 for Oscar Charleston, 113 of 3,152 for Paul Waner. Oscar Charleston was the more frequent base stealer relative to games played.

Oscar Charleston vs Paul Waner: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Oscar Charleston or Paul Waner?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Paul Waner leads Oscar Charleston in 8 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Oscar Charleston or Paul Waner hit more home runs?
Oscar Charleston, with 183 to Paul Waner's 113.
Who had the higher OPS?
Oscar Charleston, with 1.005 to Paul Waner's .878.
Who had the higher batting average?
Oscar Charleston, with .350 to Paul Waner's .333.
Who had more hits?
Paul Waner, with 3,152 to Oscar Charleston's 1,718.

See These Players in Another Era