Babe Ruth vs Paul Waner: Career Stats Comparison
Babe Ruth has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 14 statistical categories compared on this page. Babe Ruth played 1914–1935 as a hitter; Paul Waner played 1926–1945 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Babe Ruth (1914–1935) and Paul Waner (1926–1945) — they broke in during the 1910s and the 1920s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Babe Ruth finished with 2,873 hits and 714 home runs; Paul Waner finished with 3,152 hits and 113 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Babe Ruth, with 714 to Paul Waner's 113.
- Who had the higher OPS? Babe Ruth, with 1.164 to Paul Waner's .878.
- Who had the higher batting average? Babe Ruth, with .342 to Paul Waner's .333.
- Who had more hits? Paul Waner, with 3,152 to Babe Ruth's 2,873.
- Who drove in more runs? Babe Ruth, with 2,217 to Paul Waner's 1,309.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Babe Ruth, with 111,979 career PIV to Paul Waner's 40,296.
- Who won more championships? Babe Ruth, with 7 World Series titles to Paul Waner's 0.
Babe Ruth
Paul Waner
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Babe Ruth and Paul Waner. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted -- a .305 in 1965 and a .298 in 2001 came out of very different run environments -- so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Babe Ruth | Paul Waner |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 2,503 | Leads: 2,549 |
| At-Bats | 8,398 | Leads: 9,459 |
| Runs | Leads: 2,174 | 1,627 |
| Hits | 2,873 | Leads: 3,152 |
| Doubles | 506 | Leads: 605 |
| Triples | 136 | Leads: 191 |
| Home Runs | Leads: 714 | 113 |
| RBI | Leads: 2,217 | 1,309 |
| Walks | Leads: 2,062 | 1,091 |
| Strikeouts | 1,330 | 376 |
| Stolen Bases | Leads: 123 | 104 |
| Batting Avg | Leads: .342 | .333 |
| On-Base % | Leads: .474 | .404 |
| Slugging % | Leads: .690 | .473 |
| OPS | Leads: 1.164 | .878 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Babe Ruth outpaces Paul Waner 111,979 to 40,296 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (5,090 vs 1,832 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Babe Ruth — top 3 seasons by OPS
Paul Waner — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Babe Ruth leads in home runs, RBI, runs, and stolen bases, while Paul Waner owns hits. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Babe Ruth. PIV agrees: Babe Ruth grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Babe Ruth vs Paul Waner: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Babe Ruth or Paul Waner?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Babe Ruth leads Paul Waner in 9 of 14 categories.
- Did Babe Ruth or Paul Waner hit more home runs?
- Babe Ruth, with 714 to Paul Waner's 113.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Babe Ruth, with 1.164 to Paul Waner's .878.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Babe Ruth, with .342 to Paul Waner's .333.
- Who had more hits?
- Paul Waner, with 3,152 to Babe Ruth's 2,873.