Roger Connor vs Mule Suttles: Career Stats Comparison

Roger Connor has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Roger Connor played 1880–1897 as a hitter; Mule Suttles played ?–1944 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Roger Connor (1880–1897) and Mule Suttles (?–1944) — their careers are worth a careful side-by-side. Roger Connor finished with 2,467 hits and 138 home runs; Mule Suttles finished with 1,168 hits and 188 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Mule Suttles, with 188 to Roger Connor's 138.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Mule Suttles, with 1.025 to Roger Connor's .883.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Mule Suttles, with .339 to Roger Connor's .316.
  • Who had more hits? Roger Connor, with 2,467 to Mule Suttles's 1,168.
  • Who drove in more runs? Roger Connor, with 1,323 to Mule Suttles's 930.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Roger Connor, with 46,736 career PIV to Mule Suttles's 23,097.
  • Who won more championships? Roger Connor, with 2 World Series titles to Mule Suttles's 0.
Leads Roger Connor 9 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Roger Connor +23,639
Read the verdict ↓

Roger Connor

Hitter · 1880–1897
Games
1,998
Hits
2,467
Home Runs
138
RBI
1,323
Avg
.316
OPS
.883
View Roger Connor's full profile →

Mule Suttles

Hitter · ?–1944
Games
972
Hits
1,168
Home Runs
188
RBI
930
Avg
.339
OPS
1.025
View Mule Suttles's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Roger Connor and Mule Suttles. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Roger Connor vs Mule Suttles: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Roger Connor Mule Suttles
Games Leads: 1,998 972
At-Bats Leads: 7,797 3,448
Runs Leads: 1,620 763
Hits Leads: 2,467 1,168
Doubles Leads: 441 229
Triples Leads: 233 81
Home Runs 138 Leads: 188
RBI Leads: 1,323 930
Walks Leads: 1,002 389
Strikeouts not scored 455 24
Stolen Bases Leads: 244 92
Batting Avg .316 Leads: .339
On-Base % .397 Leads: .409
Slugging % .486 Leads: .616
OPS .883 Leads: 1.025

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Roger Connor outpaces Mule Suttles 46,736 to 23,097 — driven by per-season impact — 2,460 PIV per season to 924 — rather than by longevity, since Roger Connor played 19 seasons to Mule Suttles's 25. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Roger Connor
46,736
Career PIV · 2,460 per season (19 seasons)
Mule Suttles
23,097
Career PIV · 924 per season (25 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Roger Connor — top 3 seasons by OPS

1890.998 OPS14 HR, 103 RBI, .349 avg
1894.991 OPS7 HR, 79 RBI, .321 avg
1889.955 OPS13 HR, 130 RBI, .317 avg

Mule Suttles — top 3 seasons by OPS

19261.349 OPS32 HR, 130 RBI, .425 avg
19281.110 OPS21 HR, 75 RBI, .359 avg
19291.047 OPS20 HR, 109 RBI, .351 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Roger Connor leads in hits, RBI, runs, and stolen bases, while Mule Suttles owns home runs, batting average, and OBP. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Roger Connor. PIV agrees: Roger Connor grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Roger Connor and Mule Suttles careers compare

No season is shared: Roger Connor played 1880–1897, Mule Suttles ?–1944. Playing time explains much of the gap in the counting rows: Roger Connor appeared in 1,998 games to Mule Suttles's 972. Roger Connor walked more often than struck out (1,002 walks, 455 strikeouts); Mule Suttles walked more often than struck out (389 walks, 24 strikeouts). Home runs make up a larger share of Mule Suttles's hits: 138 of 2,467 for Roger Connor, 188 of 1,168 for Mule Suttles. On the bases, Roger Connor stole more often per game played (244 steals in 1,998 games for Roger Connor, 92 in 972 for Mule Suttles).

Roger Connor vs Mule Suttles: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Roger Connor or Mule Suttles?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Roger Connor leads Mule Suttles in 9 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Roger Connor or Mule Suttles hit more home runs?
Mule Suttles, with 188 to Roger Connor's 138.
Who had the higher OPS?
Mule Suttles, with 1.025 to Roger Connor's .883.
Who had the higher batting average?
Mule Suttles, with .339 to Roger Connor's .316.
Who had more hits?
Roger Connor, with 2,467 to Mule Suttles's 1,168.