George Grantham vs Paul Waner: Career Stats Comparison

Paul Waner has the better career line of the two, leading 13 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). George Grantham played 1922–1934 as a hitter; Paul Waner played 1926–1945 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

George Grantham (1922–1934) and Paul Waner (1926–1945) — both broke in during the 1920s, which makes the head-to-head feel like a contemporaries' debate. George Grantham finished with 1,508 hits and 105 home runs; Paul Waner finished with 3,152 hits and 113 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Paul Waner, with 113 to George Grantham's 105.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Paul Waner, with .878 to George Grantham's .854.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Paul Waner, with .333 to George Grantham's .302.
  • Who had more hits? Paul Waner, with 3,152 to George Grantham's 1,508.
  • Who drove in more runs? Paul Waner, with 1,309 to George Grantham's 712.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Paul Waner, with 40,296 career PIV to George Grantham's 16,892.
  • Who won more championships? George Grantham, with 1 World Series title to Paul Waner's 0.
Leads Paul Waner 13 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Paul Waner +23,404
Read the verdict ↓

George Grantham

Hitter · 1922–1934
Games
1,444
Hits
1,508
Home Runs
105
RBI
712
Avg
.302
OPS
.854
View George Grantham's full profile →

Paul Waner

Hitter · 1926–1945
Games
2,549
Hits
3,152
Home Runs
113
RBI
1,309
Avg
.333
OPS
.878
View Paul Waner's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for George Grantham and Paul Waner. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

George Grantham vs Paul Waner: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic George Grantham Paul Waner
Games 1,444 Leads: 2,549
At-Bats 4,989 Leads: 9,459
Runs 912 Leads: 1,627
Hits 1,508 Leads: 3,152
Doubles 292 Leads: 605
Triples 93 Leads: 191
Home Runs 105 Leads: 113
RBI 712 Leads: 1,309
Walks 717 Leads: 1,091
Strikeouts not scored 526 376
Stolen Bases Leads: 132 104
Batting Avg .302 Leads: .333
On-Base % .392 Leads: .404
Slugging % .461 Leads: .473
OPS .854 Leads: .878

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Paul Waner outpaces George Grantham 40,296 to 16,892 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 1,832 PIV per season to 1,299, across 22 seasons to 13. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

George Grantham
16,892
Career PIV · 1,299 per season (13 seasons)
Paul Waner
40,296
Career PIV · 1,832 per season (22 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

George Grantham — top 3 seasons by OPS

1929.987 OPS12 HR, 90 RBI, .307 avg
1930.947 OPS18 HR, 99 RBI, .324 avg
1925.906 OPS8 HR, 52 RBI, .326 avg

Paul Waner — top 3 seasons by OPS

1928.992 OPS6 HR, 86 RBI, .370 avg
1927.986 OPS9 HR, 131 RBI, .380 avg
1934.968 OPS14 HR, 90 RBI, .362 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Paul Waner leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while George Grantham owns stolen bases. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Paul Waner. PIV agrees: Paul Waner grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the George Grantham and Paul Waner careers compare

The careers of George Grantham (1922–1934) and Paul Waner (1926–1945) overlapped from 1926 to 1934, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. Paul Waner has the far longer record, 2,549 games against 1,444 across 13 and 22 PIV seasons, which inflates every career total. The green cells for George Grantham are stolen bases (132 to 104). At the plate, George Grantham walked more often than struck out (717 walks, 526 strikeouts), and Paul Waner walked more often than struck out (1,091 walks, 376 strikeouts). George Grantham is the more power-leaning hitter, with 105 of 1,508 hits leaving the park. George Grantham was the more frequent base stealer relative to games played.

George Grantham vs Paul Waner: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, George Grantham or Paul Waner?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Paul Waner leads George Grantham in 13 of the 14 scored categories.
Did George Grantham or Paul Waner hit more home runs?
Paul Waner, with 113 to George Grantham's 105.
Who had the higher OPS?
Paul Waner, with .878 to George Grantham's .854.
Who had the higher batting average?
Paul Waner, with .333 to George Grantham's .302.
Who had more hits?
Paul Waner, with 3,152 to George Grantham's 1,508.

See These Players in Another Era