Walter Johnson vs Clayton Kershaw: Career Stats Comparison
Walter Johnson has the better career line of the two, leading 10 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Walter Johnson played 1907–1927 as a pitcher; Clayton Kershaw played 2008–2025 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Walter Johnson (1907–1927) and Clayton Kershaw (2008–2025) — breaking in during the 1900s and the 2000s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Walter Johnson finished with 417 wins and 3,509 strikeouts; Clayton Kershaw finished with 223 wins and 3,052 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Walter Johnson, with 2.17 to Clayton Kershaw's 2.53.
- Who won more games? Walter Johnson, with 417 to Clayton Kershaw's 223.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Walter Johnson, with 3,509 to Clayton Kershaw's 3,052.
- Who had the better WHIP? Clayton Kershaw, with 1.02 to Walter Johnson's 1.06.
- Who pitched more innings? Walter Johnson, with 5,914.2 to Clayton Kershaw's 2,855.1.
- Who threw more shutouts? Walter Johnson, with 110 to Clayton Kershaw's 15.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Walter Johnson, with 124,021 career Pitcher PIV to Clayton Kershaw's 93,455.
Walter Johnson
Clayton Kershaw
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1900s and the 2000s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Walter Johnson | Clayton Kershaw |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | Leads: 417 | 223 |
| Losses not scored | 279 | 96 |
| Games | Leads: 802 | 455 |
| Games Started | Leads: 666 | 451 |
| Complete Games | Leads: 531 | 25 |
| Shutouts | Leads: 110 | 15 |
| Saves | Leads: 34 | 0 |
| Strikeouts | Leads: 3,509 | 3,052 |
| Walks not scored | 1,363 | 713 |
| Hits Allowed not scored | 4,913 | 2,193 |
| Home Runs Allowed not scored | 97 | 235 |
| Innings Pitched | Leads: 5,914.2 | 2,855.1 |
| ERA | Leads: 2.17 | 2.53 |
| WHIP | 1.06 | Leads: 1.02 |
| K/9 | 5.34 | Leads: 9.62 |
| BB/9 | Leads: 2.07 | 2.25 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Walter Johnson leads Clayton Kershaw 124,021 to 93,455 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 5,906 PIV per season to 5,192, across 21 seasons to 18. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Walter Johnson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Clayton Kershaw — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Walter Johnson leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and innings pitched, while Clayton Kershaw owns WHIP and K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Walter Johnson. PIV agrees: Walter Johnson grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the Walter Johnson and Clayton Kershaw careers compare
Walter Johnson (1907–1927) was finished before Clayton Kershaw (2008–2025) arrived, so they never shared a league. Playing time explains much of the gap in the counting rows: Walter Johnson appeared in 802 games to Clayton Kershaw's 455. Where Clayton Kershaw comes out ahead, it is in WHIP (1.02 to 1.06) and strikeouts per nine (9.62 to 5.34). The per-nine rows read 5.34 strikeouts and 2.07 walks for Walter Johnson, 9.62 and 2.25 for Clayton Kershaw. Both had the same role: Walter Johnson was mainly a starter (666 starts in 802 games); Clayton Kershaw was mainly a starter (451 starts in 455 games).
Walter Johnson vs Clayton Kershaw: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Walter Johnson or Clayton Kershaw?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Walter Johnson leads Clayton Kershaw in 10 of the 12 scored categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Walter Johnson, with 2.17 to Clayton Kershaw's 2.53.
- Who won more games?
- Walter Johnson, with 417 to Clayton Kershaw's 223.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Walter Johnson, with 3,509 to Clayton Kershaw's 3,052.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Clayton Kershaw, with 1.02 to Walter Johnson's 1.06.