Sadie McMahon vs Amos Rusie: Career Stats Comparison
Sadie McMahon (1889–1897) and Amos Rusie (1889–1901) — both came up during the 1880s, so the matchup is a direct one. Sadie McMahon compiled 173 wins and 967 strikeouts; Amos Rusie put up 246 wins and 1,950 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Sadie McMahon
Amos Rusie
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. For pitchers, lower ERA, WHIP, and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads.
| Statistic | Sadie McMahon | Amos Rusie |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 173 | 246 |
| Losses | 127 | 174 |
| Games | 321 | 463 |
| Games Started | 305 | 427 |
| Complete Games | 279 | 393 |
| Shutouts | 14 | 30 |
| Saves | 4 | 5 |
| Strikeouts | 967 | 1,950 |
| Walks | 945 | 1,707 |
| Hits Allowed | 2,726 | 3,389 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 52 | 75 |
| Innings Pitched | 2,634 | 3,778 |
| ERA | 3.51 | 3.07 |
| WHIP | 1.39 | 1.35 |
| K/9 | 3.30 | 4.64 |
| BB/9 | 3.23 | 4.07 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Amos Rusie outpaces Sadie McMahon 43,707 to 27,104 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (4,371 vs 2,710 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Sadie McMahon — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Amos Rusie — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Amos Rusie leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Sadie McMahon owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Amos Rusie. PIV agrees: Amos Rusie grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.