Waite Hoyt vs Rube Marquard: Career Stats Comparison
Waite Hoyt (1918–1938) and Rube Marquard (1908–1925) — breaking in during the 1910s and the 1900s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Waite Hoyt compiled 237 wins and 1,206 strikeouts; Rube Marquard put up 201 wins and 1,593 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Waite Hoyt
Rube Marquard
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. For pitchers, lower ERA, WHIP, and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads.
| Statistic | Waite Hoyt | Rube Marquard |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 237 | 201 |
| Losses | 182 | 177 |
| Games | 674 | 536 |
| Games Started | 423 | 404 |
| Complete Games | 226 | 197 |
| Shutouts | 26 | 30 |
| Saves | 52 | 19 |
| Strikeouts | 1,206 | 1,593 |
| Walks | 1,003 | 858 |
| Hits Allowed | 4,037 | 3,233 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 154 | 107 |
| Innings Pitched | 3,762 | 3,306 |
| ERA | 3.59 | 3.08 |
| WHIP | 1.34 | 1.24 |
| K/9 | 2.88 | 4.34 |
| BB/9 | 2.40 | 2.34 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Rube Marquard edges Waite Hoyt 28,636 to 27,173 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (1,507 vs 1,087 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Waite Hoyt — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Rube Marquard — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Rube Marquard leads in strikeouts, ERA, WHIP, and K/9, while Waite Hoyt owns wins and innings pitched. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Rube Marquard. PIV agrees: Rube Marquard grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.