Rube Marquard vs Christy Mathewson: Career Stats Comparison

Christy Mathewson has the better career line of the two, leading 12 of the 12 statistical categories compared on this page. Rube Marquard played 1908–1925 as a pitcher; Christy Mathewson played 1900–1916 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Rube Marquard (1908–1925) and Christy Mathewson (1900–1916) — both came up during the 1900s, so the matchup is a direct one. Rube Marquard compiled 201 wins and 1,593 strikeouts; Christy Mathewson put up 373 wins and 2,507 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Christy Mathewson, with 2.13 to Rube Marquard's 3.08.
  • Who won more games? Christy Mathewson, with 373 to Rube Marquard's 201.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Christy Mathewson, with 2,507 to Rube Marquard's 1,593.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Christy Mathewson, with 1.06 to Rube Marquard's 1.24.
  • Who pitched more innings? Christy Mathewson, with 4,788 to Rube Marquard's 3,306.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Christy Mathewson, with 79 to Rube Marquard's 30.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Christy Mathewson, with 82,446 career Pitcher PIV to Rube Marquard's 28,636.
Leads Christy Mathewson 12 of 12 awarded categories
Pitcher PIV edge Christy Mathewson +53,810
Read the verdict ↓

Rube Marquard

Pitcher · 1908–1925
Wins
201
Losses
177
Strikeouts
1,593
ERA
3.08
WHIP
1.24
IP
3,306
View Rube Marquard's full profile →

Christy Mathewson

Pitcher · 1900–1916
Wins
373
Losses
188
Strikeouts
2,507
ERA
2.13
WHIP
1.06
IP
4,788
View Christy Mathewson's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted: compare them with the era in mind, or use the PIV card below, which is.

Rube Marquard vs Christy Mathewson: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Rube Marquard Christy Mathewson
Wins 201 Leads: 373
Losses 177 188
Games 536 Leads: 636
Games Started 404 Leads: 552
Complete Games 197 Leads: 435
Shutouts 30 Leads: 79
Saves 19 Leads: 29
Strikeouts 1,593 Leads: 2,507
Walks 858 848
Hits Allowed 3,233 4,219
Home Runs Allowed 107 90
Innings Pitched 3,306 Leads: 4,788
ERA 3.08 Leads: 2.13
WHIP 1.24 Leads: 1.06
K/9 4.34 Leads: 4.71
BB/9 2.34 Leads: 1.59

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Christy Mathewson outpaces Rube Marquard 82,446 to 28,636 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (4,580 vs 1,507 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

Rube Marquard
28,636
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,507 per season (19 seasons)
Christy Mathewson
82,446
Career Pitcher PIV · 4,580 per season (18 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Rube Marquard — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19161.58 ERA13-6, 107 K in 205 IP
19112.50 ERA24-7, 237 K in 277 IP
19132.50 ERA23-10, 151 K in 288 IP

Christy Mathewson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19091.14 ERA25-6, 149 K in 275 IP
19051.28 ERA31-9, 206 K in 338 IP
19081.43 ERA37-11, 259 K in 390 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Christy Mathewson leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Rube Marquard owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Christy Mathewson. PIV agrees: Christy Mathewson grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

Rube Marquard vs Christy Mathewson: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Rube Marquard or Christy Mathewson?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Christy Mathewson leads Rube Marquard in 12 of 12 categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Christy Mathewson, with 2.13 to Rube Marquard's 3.08.
Who won more games?
Christy Mathewson, with 373 to Rube Marquard's 201.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Christy Mathewson, with 2,507 to Rube Marquard's 1,593.
Who had the better WHIP?
Christy Mathewson, with 1.06 to Rube Marquard's 1.24.

See These Players in Another Era