Pete Alonso vs Frank McCormick: Career Stats Comparison

Frank McCormick has the better career line of the two, leading 10 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Pete Alonso has played 2019–present as a hitter; Frank McCormick played 1934–1948 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Pete Alonso (2019–present) and Frank McCormick (1934–1948) — they broke in during the 2010s and the 1930s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Pete Alonso has 1,112 hits and 307 home runs through October 12, 2026; Frank McCormick finished with 1,711 hits and 128 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Pete Alonso, with 307 to Frank McCormick's 128.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Pete Alonso, with .861 to Frank McCormick's .781.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Frank McCormick, with .299 to Pete Alonso's .255.
  • Who had more hits? Frank McCormick, with 1,711 to Pete Alonso's 1,112.
  • Who drove in more runs? Frank McCormick, with 951 to Pete Alonso's 825.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Pete Alonso, with 13,899 career PIV to Frank McCormick's 11,670.
  • Who won more championships? Frank McCormick, with 1 World Series title to Pete Alonso's 0.
Leads Frank McCormick 10 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Pete Alonso +2,230
Read the verdict ↓

Pete Alonso

Hitter · 2019–present
Games
1,168
Hits
1,112
Home Runs
307
RBI
825
Avg
.255
OPS
.861
View Pete Alonso's full profile →

Frank McCormick

Hitter · 1934–1948
Games
1,534
Hits
1,711
Home Runs
128
RBI
951
Avg
.299
OPS
.781
View Frank McCormick's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Pete Alonso and Frank McCormick. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 2010s and the 1930s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Pete Alonso is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.

Pete Alonso vs Frank McCormick: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Pete Alonso Frank McCormick
Games 1,168 Leads: 1,534
At-Bats 4,365 Leads: 5,723
Runs 680 Leads: 722
Hits 1,112 Leads: 1,711
Doubles 207 Leads: 334
Triples 8 Leads: 26
Home Runs Leads: 307 128
RBI 825 Leads: 951
Walks Leads: 500 399
Strikeouts not scored 1,153 189
Stolen Bases 23 Leads: 27
Batting Avg .255 Leads: .299
On-Base % .344 Leads: .348
Slugging % Leads: .517 .434
OPS Leads: .861 .781

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Pete Alonso leads Frank McCormick 13,899 to 11,670 — driven by per-season impact — 1,986 PIV per season to 834 — rather than by longevity, since Pete Alonso played 7 seasons to Frank McCormick's 14. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Pete Alonso
13,899
Career PIV · 1,986 per season (7 seasons)
Frank McCormick
11,670
Career PIV · 834 per season (14 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Pete Alonso — top 3 seasons by OPS

2019.941 OPS53 HR, 120 RBI, .260 avg
2026 (in progress).884 OPS43 HR, 113 RBI, .267 avg
2025.871 OPS38 HR, 126 RBI, .272 avg

Frank McCormick — top 3 seasons by OPS

1939.869 OPS18 HR, 128 RBI, .332 avg
1944.853 OPS20 HR, 102 RBI, .305 avg
1940.850 OPS19 HR, 127 RBI, .309 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Frank McCormick leads in hits, RBI, runs, and stolen bases, while Pete Alonso owns home runs and OPS. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Frank McCormick. Note that PIV actually grades Pete Alonso ahead, which means Frank McCormick's edge is partly volume. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Pete Alonso and Frank McCormick careers compare

No season is shared: Frank McCormick played 1934–1948, Pete Alonso 2019–present. With 1,168 games against 1,534 across 7 and 14 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. Pete Alonso's edges on the table are home runs (307 to 128), walks (500 to 399), and slugging percentage (.517 to .434). Plate discipline differs: Pete Alonso struck out more than walked (1,153 to 500), but Frank McCormick walked more often than struck out (399 walks, 189 strikeouts). Pete Alonso is the more power-leaning hitter, with 307 of 1,112 hits leaving the park. Frank McCormick's on-base percentage of .348 tops Pete Alonso's .344. Because Pete Alonso is still playing, the totals above will keep moving through the season.

Pete Alonso vs Frank McCormick: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Pete Alonso or Frank McCormick?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Frank McCormick leads Pete Alonso in 10 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Pete Alonso or Frank McCormick hit more home runs?
Pete Alonso, with 307 to Frank McCormick's 128.
Who had the higher OPS?
Pete Alonso, with .861 to Frank McCormick's .781.
Who had the higher batting average?
Frank McCormick, with .299 to Pete Alonso's .255.
Who had more hits?
Frank McCormick, with 1,711 to Pete Alonso's 1,112.