Luke Appling vs Lou Gehrig: Career Stats Comparison
Lou Gehrig has the better career line of the two, leading 10 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Luke Appling played 1930–1950 as a hitter; Lou Gehrig played 1923–1939 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Luke Appling (1930–1950) and Lou Gehrig (1923–1939) — they broke in during the 1930s and the 1920s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Luke Appling finished with 2,749 hits and 45 home runs; Lou Gehrig finished with 2,721 hits and 493 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Lou Gehrig, with 493 to Luke Appling's 45.
- Who had the higher OPS? Lou Gehrig, with 1.080 to Luke Appling's .798.
- Who had the higher batting average? Lou Gehrig, with .340 to Luke Appling's .310.
- Who had more hits? Luke Appling, with 2,749 to Lou Gehrig's 2,721.
- Who drove in more runs? Lou Gehrig, with 1,995 to Luke Appling's 1,116.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Lou Gehrig, with 81,072 career PIV to Luke Appling's 25,114.
- Who won more championships? Lou Gehrig, with 8 World Series titles to Luke Appling's 0.
Luke Appling
Lou Gehrig
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Luke Appling and Lou Gehrig. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1930s and the 1920s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Luke Appling | Lou Gehrig |
|---|---|---|
| Games | Leads: 2,422 | 2,164 |
| At-Bats | Leads: 8,856 | 8,001 |
| Runs | 1,319 | Leads: 1,888 |
| Hits | Leads: 2,749 | 2,721 |
| Doubles | 440 | Leads: 534 |
| Triples | 102 | Leads: 163 |
| Home Runs | 45 | Leads: 493 |
| RBI | 1,116 | Leads: 1,995 |
| Walks | 1,302 | Leads: 1,508 |
| Strikeouts not scored | 528 | 790 |
| Stolen Bases | Leads: 179 | 102 |
| Batting Avg | .310 | Leads: .340 |
| On-Base % | .399 | Leads: .447 |
| Slugging % | .398 | Leads: .632 |
| OPS | .798 | Leads: 1.080 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Lou Gehrig outpaces Luke Appling 81,072 to 25,114 — driven by per-season impact — 4,769 PIV per season to 1,256 — rather than by longevity, since Lou Gehrig played 17 seasons to Luke Appling's 20. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Luke Appling — top 3 seasons by OPS
Lou Gehrig — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Lou Gehrig leads in home runs, RBI, runs, and batting average, while Luke Appling owns hits and stolen bases. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Lou Gehrig. PIV agrees: Lou Gehrig grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the Luke Appling and Lou Gehrig careers compare
Luke Appling and Lou Gehrig were active at the same time between 1930 and 1939. The two careers are close in length, 2,422 games for Luke Appling and 2,164 for Lou Gehrig across 20 and 17 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Luke Appling's edges on the table are games (2,422 to 2,164), at-bats (8,856 to 8,001), and hits (2,749 to 2,721). Luke Appling walked more often than struck out (1,302 walks, 528 strikeouts); Lou Gehrig walked more often than struck out (1,508 walks, 790 strikeouts). Lou Gehrig is the more power-leaning hitter, with 493 of 2,721 hits leaving the park.
Luke Appling vs Lou Gehrig: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Luke Appling or Lou Gehrig?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Lou Gehrig leads Luke Appling in 10 of the 14 scored categories.
- Did Luke Appling or Lou Gehrig hit more home runs?
- Lou Gehrig, with 493 to Luke Appling's 45.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Lou Gehrig, with 1.080 to Luke Appling's .798.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Lou Gehrig, with .340 to Luke Appling's .310.
- Who had more hits?
- Luke Appling, with 2,749 to Lou Gehrig's 2,721.