Luke Appling vs Josh Gibson: Career Stats Comparison

Luke Appling has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Luke Appling played 1930–1950 as a hitter; Josh Gibson played ?–1946 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Luke Appling (1930–1950) and Josh Gibson (?–1946) — their careers are worth a careful side-by-side. Luke Appling finished with 2,749 hits and 45 home runs; Josh Gibson finished with 1,007 hits and 197 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Josh Gibson, with 197 to Luke Appling's 45.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Josh Gibson, with 1.136 to Luke Appling's .798.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Josh Gibson, with .364 to Luke Appling's .310.
  • Who had more hits? Luke Appling, with 2,749 to Josh Gibson's 1,007.
  • Who drove in more runs? Luke Appling, with 1,116 to Josh Gibson's 872.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Josh Gibson, with 28,319 career PIV to Luke Appling's 25,114.
  • Who won more championships? Josh Gibson, with 2 World Series titles to Luke Appling's 0.
Leads Luke Appling 9 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Josh Gibson +3,205
Read the verdict ↓

Luke Appling

Hitter · 1930–1950
Games
2,422
Hits
2,749
Home Runs
45
RBI
1,116
Avg
.310
OPS
.798
View Luke Appling's full profile →

Josh Gibson

Hitter · ?–1946
Games
766
Hits
1,007
Home Runs
197
RBI
872
Avg
.364
OPS
1.136
View Josh Gibson's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Luke Appling and Josh Gibson. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Luke Appling vs Josh Gibson: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Luke Appling Josh Gibson
Games Leads: 2,422 766
At-Bats Leads: 8,856 2,768
Runs Leads: 1,319 733
Hits Leads: 2,749 1,007
Doubles Leads: 440 170
Triples Leads: 102 72
Home Runs 45 Leads: 197
RBI Leads: 1,116 872
Walks Leads: 1,302 400
Strikeouts not scored 528 20
Stolen Bases Leads: 179 44
Batting Avg .310 Leads: .364
On-Base % .399 Leads: .446
Slugging % .398 Leads: .691
OPS .798 Leads: 1.136

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Josh Gibson leads Luke Appling 28,319 to 25,114 — driven by per-season impact — 1,666 PIV per season to 1,256 — rather than by longevity, since Josh Gibson played 17 seasons to Luke Appling's 20. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Luke Appling
25,114
Career PIV · 1,256 per season (20 seasons)
Josh Gibson
28,319
Career PIV · 1,666 per season (17 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Luke Appling — top 3 seasons by OPS

1936.981 OPS6 HR, 128 RBI, .388 avg
1940.862 OPS0 HR, 79 RBI, .348 avg
1937.846 OPS4 HR, 77 RBI, .317 avg

Josh Gibson

No seasons meet the qualifying workload, so there is no peak-season list to show.

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Josh Gibson leads in home runs, batting average, OBP, and OPS, while Luke Appling owns hits, RBI, and runs. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Josh Gibson. PIV agrees: Josh Gibson grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Luke Appling and Josh Gibson careers compare

From 1946 through 1946, Luke Appling and Josh Gibson were in the majors together. The table compares 2,422 games of Luke Appling with 766 of Josh Gibson across 20 and 17 PIV seasons; totals favor the longer career by default. Luke Appling walked more often than struck out (1,302 walks, 528 strikeouts); Josh Gibson walked more often than struck out (400 walks, 20 strikeouts). Home runs make up a larger share of Josh Gibson's hits: 45 of 2,749 for Luke Appling, 197 of 1,007 for Josh Gibson. On the bases, Luke Appling stole more often per game played (179 steals in 2,422 games for Luke Appling, 44 in 766 for Josh Gibson).

Luke Appling vs Josh Gibson: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Luke Appling or Josh Gibson?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Luke Appling leads Josh Gibson in 9 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Luke Appling or Josh Gibson hit more home runs?
Josh Gibson, with 197 to Luke Appling's 45.
Who had the higher OPS?
Josh Gibson, with 1.136 to Luke Appling's .798.
Who had the higher batting average?
Josh Gibson, with .364 to Luke Appling's .310.
Who had more hits?
Luke Appling, with 2,749 to Josh Gibson's 1,007.