Luke Appling vs Gunnar Henderson: Career Stats Comparison

Luke Appling has the better career line of the two, leading 11 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Luke Appling played 1930–1950 as a hitter; Gunnar Henderson has played 2022–present as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Luke Appling (1930–1950) and Gunnar Henderson (2022–present) — they broke in during the 1930s and the 2020s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Luke Appling finished with 2,749 hits and 45 home runs; Gunnar Henderson has 648 hits and 110 home runs through October 6, 2026. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Gunnar Henderson, with 110 to Luke Appling's 45.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Gunnar Henderson, with .801 to Luke Appling's .798.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Luke Appling, with .310 to Gunnar Henderson's .259.
  • Who had more hits? Luke Appling, with 2,749 to Gunnar Henderson's 648.
  • Who drove in more runs? Luke Appling, with 1,116 to Gunnar Henderson's 319.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Luke Appling, with 25,114 career PIV to Gunnar Henderson's 5,834.
Leads Luke Appling 11 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Luke Appling +19,280
Read the verdict ↓

Luke Appling

Hitter · 1930–1950
Games
2,422
Hits
2,749
Home Runs
45
RBI
1,116
Avg
.310
OPS
.798
View Luke Appling's full profile →

Gunnar Henderson

Hitter · 2022–present
Games
655
Hits
648
Home Runs
110
RBI
319
Avg
.259
OPS
.801
View Gunnar Henderson's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Luke Appling and Gunnar Henderson. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1930s and the 2020s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Gunnar Henderson is still active — his totals below are current through October 6, 2026.

Luke Appling vs Gunnar Henderson: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Luke Appling Gunnar Henderson
Games Leads: 2,422 655
At-Bats Leads: 8,856 2,506
Runs Leads: 1,319 403
Hits Leads: 2,749 648
Doubles Leads: 440 128
Triples Leads: 102 28
Home Runs 45 Leads: 110
RBI Leads: 1,116 319
Walks Leads: 1,302 279
Strikeouts not scored 528 645
Stolen Bases Leads: 179 72
Batting Avg Leads: .310 .259
On-Base % Leads: .399 .338
Slugging % .398 Leads: .464
OPS .798 Leads: .801

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Luke Appling outpaces Gunnar Henderson 25,114 to 5,834 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: Luke Appling played 20 seasons to Gunnar Henderson's 4, while Gunnar Henderson carries the higher per-season figure (1,458 to 1,256). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Luke Appling
25,114
Career PIV · 1,256 per season (20 seasons)
Gunnar Henderson
5,834
Career PIV · 1,458 per season (4 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Luke Appling — top 3 seasons by OPS

1936.981 OPS6 HR, 128 RBI, .388 avg
1940.862 OPS0 HR, 79 RBI, .348 avg
1937.846 OPS4 HR, 77 RBI, .317 avg

Gunnar Henderson — top 3 seasons by OPS

2024.893 OPS37 HR, 92 RBI, .281 avg
2023.814 OPS28 HR, 82 RBI, .255 avg
2025.787 OPS17 HR, 68 RBI, .274 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Luke Appling leads in hits, RBI, runs, and stolen bases, while Gunnar Henderson owns home runs and OPS. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Luke Appling. PIV agrees: Luke Appling grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Luke Appling and Gunnar Henderson careers compare

Luke Appling (1930–1950) was finished before Gunnar Henderson (2022–present) arrived, so they never shared a league. Luke Appling has the far longer record, 2,422 games against 655 across 20 and 4 PIV seasons, which inflates every career total. The green cells for Gunnar Henderson are home runs (110 to 45), slugging percentage (.464 to .398), and OPS (.801 to .798). At the plate, Luke Appling walked more often than struck out (1,302 walks, 528 strikeouts), while Gunnar Henderson struck out more than walked (645 to 279). Gunnar Henderson is the more power-leaning hitter, with 110 of 648 hits leaving the park. Gunnar Henderson was the more frequent base stealer relative to games played. Because Gunnar Henderson is still playing, the totals above will keep moving through the season.

Luke Appling vs Gunnar Henderson: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Luke Appling or Gunnar Henderson?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Luke Appling leads Gunnar Henderson in 11 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Luke Appling or Gunnar Henderson hit more home runs?
Gunnar Henderson, with 110 to Luke Appling's 45.
Who had the higher OPS?
Gunnar Henderson, with .801 to Luke Appling's .798.
Who had the higher batting average?
Luke Appling, with .310 to Gunnar Henderson's .259.
Who had more hits?
Luke Appling, with 2,749 to Gunnar Henderson's 648.