Luke Appling vs Rogers Hornsby: Career Stats Comparison
Rogers Hornsby has the better career line of the two, leading 10 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Luke Appling played 1930–1950 as a hitter; Rogers Hornsby played 1915–1937 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Luke Appling (1930–1950) and Rogers Hornsby (1915–1937) — they broke in during the 1930s and the 1910s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Luke Appling finished with 2,749 hits and 45 home runs; Rogers Hornsby finished with 2,930 hits and 301 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Rogers Hornsby, with 301 to Luke Appling's 45.
- Who had the higher OPS? Rogers Hornsby, with 1.010 to Luke Appling's .798.
- Who had the higher batting average? Rogers Hornsby, with .358 to Luke Appling's .310.
- Who had more hits? Rogers Hornsby, with 2,930 to Luke Appling's 2,749.
- Who drove in more runs? Rogers Hornsby, with 1,584 to Luke Appling's 1,116.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Rogers Hornsby, with 68,443 career PIV to Luke Appling's 25,114.
- Who won more championships? Rogers Hornsby, with 1 World Series title to Luke Appling's 0.
Luke Appling
Rogers Hornsby
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Luke Appling and Rogers Hornsby. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1930s and the 1910s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Luke Appling | Rogers Hornsby |
|---|---|---|
| Games | Leads: 2,422 | 2,259 |
| At-Bats | Leads: 8,856 | 8,173 |
| Runs | 1,319 | Leads: 1,579 |
| Hits | 2,749 | Leads: 2,930 |
| Doubles | 440 | Leads: 541 |
| Triples | 102 | Leads: 169 |
| Home Runs | 45 | Leads: 301 |
| RBI | 1,116 | Leads: 1,584 |
| Walks | Leads: 1,302 | 1,038 |
| Strikeouts not scored | 528 | 679 |
| Stolen Bases | Leads: 179 | 135 |
| Batting Avg | .310 | Leads: .358 |
| On-Base % | .399 | Leads: .434 |
| Slugging % | .398 | Leads: .577 |
| OPS | .798 | Leads: 1.010 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Rogers Hornsby outpaces Luke Appling 68,443 to 25,114 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 2,852 PIV per season to 1,256, across 24 seasons to 20. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Luke Appling — top 3 seasons by OPS
Rogers Hornsby — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Rogers Hornsby leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Luke Appling owns stolen bases. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Rogers Hornsby. PIV agrees: Rogers Hornsby grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the Luke Appling and Rogers Hornsby careers compare
The careers of Luke Appling (1930–1950) and Rogers Hornsby (1915–1937) overlapped from 1930 to 1937, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. With 2,422 games against 2,259 across 20 and 24 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. Where Luke Appling comes out ahead, it is in games (2,422 to 2,259), at-bats (8,856 to 8,173), and walks (1,302 to 1,038). At the plate, Luke Appling walked more often than struck out (1,302 walks, 528 strikeouts), and Rogers Hornsby walked more often than struck out (1,038 walks, 679 strikeouts). Rogers Hornsby is the more power-leaning hitter, with 301 of 2,930 hits leaving the park.
Luke Appling vs Rogers Hornsby: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Luke Appling or Rogers Hornsby?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Rogers Hornsby leads Luke Appling in 10 of the 14 scored categories.
- Did Luke Appling or Rogers Hornsby hit more home runs?
- Rogers Hornsby, with 301 to Luke Appling's 45.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Rogers Hornsby, with 1.010 to Luke Appling's .798.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Rogers Hornsby, with .358 to Luke Appling's .310.
- Who had more hits?
- Rogers Hornsby, with 2,930 to Luke Appling's 2,749.