Ernie Banks vs Duke Snider: Career Stats Comparison

Ernie Banks has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Ernie Banks played 1953–1971 as a hitter; Duke Snider played 1947–1964 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Ernie Banks (1953–1971) and Duke Snider (1947–1964) — they broke in during the 1950s and the 1940s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Ernie Banks finished with 2,583 hits and 512 home runs; Duke Snider finished with 2,116 hits and 407 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Ernie Banks, with 512 to Duke Snider's 407.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Duke Snider, with .919 to Ernie Banks's .830.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Duke Snider, with .295 to Ernie Banks's .274.
  • Who had more hits? Ernie Banks, with 2,583 to Duke Snider's 2,116.
  • Who drove in more runs? Ernie Banks, with 1,636 to Duke Snider's 1,333.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Duke Snider, with 39,968 career PIV to Ernie Banks's 30,636.
  • Who won more championships? Duke Snider, with 2 World Series titles to Ernie Banks's 0.
Leads Ernie Banks 8 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Duke Snider +9,332
Read the verdict ↓

Ernie Banks

Hitter · 1953–1971
Games
2,528
Hits
2,583
Home Runs
512
RBI
1,636
Avg
.274
OPS
.830
View Ernie Banks's full profile →

Duke Snider

Hitter · 1947–1964
Games
2,143
Hits
2,116
Home Runs
407
RBI
1,333
Avg
.295
OPS
.919
View Duke Snider's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Ernie Banks and Duke Snider. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1950s and the 1940s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Ernie Banks vs Duke Snider: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Ernie Banks Duke Snider
Games Leads: 2,528 2,143
At-Bats Leads: 9,421 7,161
Runs Leads: 1,305 1,259
Hits Leads: 2,583 2,116
Doubles Leads: 407 358
Triples Leads: 90 85
Home Runs Leads: 512 407
RBI Leads: 1,636 1,333
Walks 763 Leads: 971
Strikeouts not scored 1,236 1,237
Stolen Bases 50 Leads: 99
Batting Avg .274 Leads: .295
On-Base % .330 Leads: .380
Slugging % .500 Leads: .540
OPS .830 Leads: .919

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Duke Snider leads Ernie Banks 39,968 to 30,636 — driven by per-season impact — 2,220 PIV per season to 1,612 — rather than by longevity, since Duke Snider played 18 seasons to Ernie Banks's 19. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Ernie Banks
30,636
Career PIV · 1,612 per season (19 seasons)
Duke Snider
39,968
Career PIV · 2,220 per season (18 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Ernie Banks — top 3 seasons by OPS

1958.980 OPS47 HR, 129 RBI, .313 avg
1959.970 OPS45 HR, 143 RBI, .304 avg
1955.941 OPS44 HR, 117 RBI, .295 avg

Duke Snider — top 3 seasons by OPS

19541.071 OPS40 HR, 130 RBI, .341 avg
19531.046 OPS42 HR, 126 RBI, .336 avg
19551.046 OPS42 HR, 136 RBI, .309 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Duke Snider leads in stolen bases, batting average, OBP, and OPS, while Ernie Banks owns hits, home runs, and RBI. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Duke Snider. PIV agrees: Duke Snider grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Ernie Banks and Duke Snider careers compare

From 1953 through 1964, Ernie Banks and Duke Snider were in the majors together. With 2,528 games against 2,143 across 19 and 18 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. Ernie Banks struck out more than walked (1,236 to 763); Duke Snider struck out more than walked (1,237 to 971). Duke Snider's slugging percentage of .540 tops Ernie Banks's .500. On the peak-season lists, Ernie Banks's best year is 1958 at .980 OPS and Duke Snider's is 1954 at 1.071 OPS; Duke Snider has the stronger single season.

Ernie Banks vs Duke Snider: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Ernie Banks or Duke Snider?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Ernie Banks leads Duke Snider in 8 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Ernie Banks or Duke Snider hit more home runs?
Ernie Banks, with 512 to Duke Snider's 407.
Who had the higher OPS?
Duke Snider, with .919 to Ernie Banks's .830.
Who had the higher batting average?
Duke Snider, with .295 to Ernie Banks's .274.
Who had more hits?
Ernie Banks, with 2,583 to Duke Snider's 2,116.

See These Players in Another Era