Albert Belle vs Jim Rice: Career Stats Comparison

Jim Rice has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Albert Belle played 1989–2000 as a hitter; Jim Rice played 1974–1989 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Albert Belle (1989–2000) and Jim Rice (1974–1989) — they broke in during the 1980s and the 1970s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Albert Belle finished with 1,726 hits and 381 home runs; Jim Rice finished with 2,452 hits and 382 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Jim Rice, with 382 to Albert Belle's 381.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Albert Belle, with .933 to Jim Rice's .854.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Jim Rice, with .298 to Albert Belle's .295.
  • Who had more hits? Jim Rice, with 2,452 to Albert Belle's 1,726.
  • Who drove in more runs? Jim Rice, with 1,451 to Albert Belle's 1,239.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Jim Rice, with 31,418 career PIV to Albert Belle's 29,356.
Leads Jim Rice 8 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Jim Rice +2,062
Read the verdict ↓

Albert Belle

Hitter · 1989–2000
Games
1,539
Hits
1,726
Home Runs
381
RBI
1,239
Avg
.295
OPS
.933
View Albert Belle's full profile →

Jim Rice

Hitter · 1974–1989
Games
2,089
Hits
2,452
Home Runs
382
RBI
1,451
Avg
.298
OPS
.854
View Jim Rice's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Albert Belle and Jim Rice. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1980s and the 1970s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Albert Belle vs Jim Rice: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Albert Belle Jim Rice
Games 1,539 Leads: 2,089
At-Bats 5,853 Leads: 8,225
Runs 974 Leads: 1,249
Hits 1,726 Leads: 2,452
Doubles Leads: 389 373
Triples 21 Leads: 79
Home Runs 381 Leads: 382
RBI 1,239 Leads: 1,451
Walks Leads: 683 670
Strikeouts not scored 961 1,423
Stolen Bases Leads: 88 58
Batting Avg .295 Leads: .298
On-Base % Leads: .369 .352
Slugging % Leads: .564 .502
OPS Leads: .933 .854

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Jim Rice edges Albert Belle 31,418 to 29,356 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: Jim Rice played 16 seasons to Albert Belle's 12, while Albert Belle carries the higher per-season figure (2,446 to 1,964). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Albert Belle
29,356
Career PIV · 2,446 per season (12 seasons)
Jim Rice
31,418
Career PIV · 1,964 per season (16 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Albert Belle — top 3 seasons by OPS

19941.152 OPS36 HR, 101 RBI, .357 avg
19951.091 OPS50 HR, 126 RBI, .317 avg
19981.055 OPS49 HR, 152 RBI, .328 avg

Jim Rice — top 3 seasons by OPS

1979.977 OPS39 HR, 130 RBI, .325 avg
1978.970 OPS46 HR, 139 RBI, .315 avg
1977.969 OPS39 HR, 114 RBI, .320 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Jim Rice leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Albert Belle owns stolen bases, OBP, and OPS. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Jim Rice. PIV agrees: Jim Rice grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Albert Belle and Jim Rice careers compare

From 1989 through 1989, Albert Belle and Jim Rice were in the majors together. The two careers are close in length, 1,539 games for Albert Belle and 2,089 for Jim Rice across 12 and 16 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. At the plate, Albert Belle struck out more than walked (961 to 683), and Jim Rice struck out more than walked (1,423 to 670). Albert Belle is the more power-leaning hitter, with 381 of 1,726 hits leaving the park. In slugging percentage, Albert Belle holds the edge, .564 to .502.

Albert Belle vs Jim Rice: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Albert Belle or Jim Rice?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Jim Rice leads Albert Belle in 8 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Albert Belle or Jim Rice hit more home runs?
Jim Rice, with 382 to Albert Belle's 381.
Who had the higher OPS?
Albert Belle, with .933 to Jim Rice's .854.
Who had the higher batting average?
Jim Rice, with .298 to Albert Belle's .295.
Who had more hits?
Jim Rice, with 2,452 to Albert Belle's 1,726.