Charles Bender vs Walter Johnson: Career Stats Comparison
Walter Johnson has the better career line of the two, leading 11 of the 11 statistical categories compared on this page. Charles Bender played 1903–1925 as a pitcher; Walter Johnson played 1907–1927 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Charles Bender (1903–1925) and Walter Johnson (1907–1927) — both came up during the 1900s, so the matchup is a direct one. Charles Bender compiled 212 wins and 1,711 strikeouts; Walter Johnson put up 417 wins and 3,509 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Walter Johnson, with 2.17 to Charles Bender's 2.46.
- Who won more games? Walter Johnson, with 417 to Charles Bender's 212.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Walter Johnson, with 3,509 to Charles Bender's 1,711.
- Who had the better WHIP? Walter Johnson, with 1.06 to Charles Bender's 1.11.
- Who pitched more innings? Walter Johnson, with 5,914 to Charles Bender's 3,017.
- Who threw more shutouts? Walter Johnson, with 110 to Charles Bender's 40.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Walter Johnson, with 124,021 career Pitcher PIV to Charles Bender's 43,118.
Charles Bender
Walter Johnson
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted: compare them with the era in mind, or use the PIV card below, which is.
| Statistic | Charles Bender | Walter Johnson |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 212 | Leads: 417 |
| Losses | 127 | 279 |
| Games | 459 | Leads: 802 |
| Games Started | 334 | Leads: 666 |
| Complete Games | 255 | Leads: 531 |
| Shutouts | 40 | Leads: 110 |
| Saves | 34 | 34 |
| Strikeouts | 1,711 | Leads: 3,509 |
| Walks | 712 | 1,363 |
| Hits Allowed | 2,645 | 4,913 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 40 | 97 |
| Innings Pitched | 3,017 | Leads: 5,914 |
| ERA | 2.46 | Leads: 2.17 |
| WHIP | 1.11 | Leads: 1.06 |
| K/9 | 5.10 | Leads: 5.34 |
| BB/9 | 2.12 | Leads: 2.07 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Walter Johnson outpaces Charles Bender 124,021 to 43,118 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (5,906 vs 2,695 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Charles Bender — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Walter Johnson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Walter Johnson leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Charles Bender owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Walter Johnson. PIV agrees: Walter Johnson grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Charles Bender vs Walter Johnson: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Charles Bender or Walter Johnson?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Walter Johnson leads Charles Bender in 11 of 11 categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Walter Johnson, with 2.17 to Charles Bender's 2.46.
- Who won more games?
- Walter Johnson, with 417 to Charles Bender's 212.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Walter Johnson, with 3,509 to Charles Bender's 1,711.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Walter Johnson, with 1.06 to Charles Bender's 1.11.