Shane Bieber vs Don Newcombe: Career Stats Comparison

Don Newcombe has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Shane Bieber has played 2018–present as a pitcher; Don Newcombe played 1949–1960 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Shane Bieber (2018–present) and Don Newcombe (1949–1960) — breaking in during the 2010s and the 1940s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Shane Bieber has 71 wins and 1,039 strikeouts through October 12, 2026; Don Newcombe finished with 153 wins and 1,185 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Shane Bieber, with 3.31 to Don Newcombe's 3.57.
  • Who won more games? Don Newcombe, with 153 to Shane Bieber's 71.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Don Newcombe, with 1,185 to Shane Bieber's 1,039.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Shane Bieber, with 1.13 to Don Newcombe's 1.21.
  • Who pitched more innings? Don Newcombe, with 2,247.0 to Shane Bieber's 939.0.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Don Newcombe, with 24 to Shane Bieber's 2.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Shane Bieber, with 25,160 career Pitcher PIV to Don Newcombe's 20,184.
Leads Don Newcombe 8 of 12 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Shane Bieber +4,976
Read the verdict ↓

Shane Bieber

Pitcher · 2018–present
Wins
71
Losses
36
Strikeouts
1,039
ERA
3.31
WHIP
1.13
IP
939.0
View Shane Bieber's full profile →

Don Newcombe

Pitcher · 1949–1960
Wins
153
Losses
96
Strikeouts
1,185
ERA
3.57
WHIP
1.21
IP
2,247.0
View Don Newcombe's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 2010s and the 1940s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Shane Bieber is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.

Shane Bieber vs Don Newcombe: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Shane Bieber Don Newcombe
Wins 71 Leads: 153
Losses not scored 36 96
Games 154 Leads: 359
Games Started 152 Leads: 305
Complete Games 5 Leads: 145
Shutouts 2 Leads: 24
Saves 0 Leads: 7
Strikeouts 1,039 Leads: 1,185
Walks not scored 219 528
Hits Allowed not scored 841 2,185
Home Runs Allowed not scored 112 255
Innings Pitched 939.0 Leads: 2,247.0
ERA Leads: 3.31 3.57
WHIP Leads: 1.13 1.21
K/9 Leads: 9.96 4.75
BB/9 Leads: 2.10 2.11

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Shane Bieber leads Don Newcombe 25,160 to 20,184 — driven by per-season impact — 3,145 PIV per season to 1,442 — rather than by longevity, since Shane Bieber played 8 seasons to Don Newcombe's 14. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Shane Bieber
25,160
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,145 per season (8 seasons)
Don Newcombe
20,184
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,442 per season (14 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Shane Bieber — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20222.88 ERA13-8, 198 K in 200 IP
20193.28 ERA15-8, 259 K in 214 IP
20233.80 ERA6-6, 107 K in 128 IP

Don Newcombe — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19563.06 ERA27-7, 139 K in 268 IP
19593.16 ERA13-8, 100 K in 222 IP
19493.17 ERA17-8, 149 K in 244 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Shane Bieber leads in ERA, WHIP, and K/9, while Don Newcombe owns wins, strikeouts, and innings pitched. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Shane Bieber. PIV agrees: Shane Bieber grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Shane Bieber and Don Newcombe careers compare

Don Newcombe (1949–1960) was finished before Shane Bieber (2018–present) arrived, so they never shared a league. Playing time explains much of the gap in the counting rows: Shane Bieber has appeared in 154 games to Don Newcombe's 359. The green cells for Shane Bieber are ERA (3.31 to 3.57), WHIP (1.13 to 1.21), and strikeouts per nine (9.96 to 4.75). By rate, Shane Bieber struck out 9.96 and walked 2.10 per nine innings; Don Newcombe struck out 4.75 and walked 2.11. Both had the same role: Shane Bieber was mainly a starter (152 starts in 154 games); Don Newcombe was mainly a starter (305 starts in 359 games). Because Shane Bieber is still playing, the totals above will keep moving through the season.

Shane Bieber vs Don Newcombe: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Shane Bieber or Don Newcombe?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Don Newcombe leads Shane Bieber in 8 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Shane Bieber, with 3.31 to Don Newcombe's 3.57.
Who won more games?
Don Newcombe, with 153 to Shane Bieber's 71.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Don Newcombe, with 1,185 to Shane Bieber's 1,039.
Who had the better WHIP?
Shane Bieber, with 1.13 to Don Newcombe's 1.21.