Xander Bogaerts vs Pee Wee Reese: Career Stats Comparison

Pee Wee Reese has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Xander Bogaerts has played 2013–present as a hitter; Pee Wee Reese played 1940–1958 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Xander Bogaerts (2013–present) and Pee Wee Reese (1940–1958) — they broke in during the 2010s and the 1940s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Xander Bogaerts has 1,942 hits and 210 home runs through October 12, 2026; Pee Wee Reese finished with 2,170 hits and 126 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Xander Bogaerts, with 210 to Pee Wee Reese's 126.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Xander Bogaerts, with .787 to Pee Wee Reese's .743.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Xander Bogaerts, with .283 to Pee Wee Reese's .269.
  • Who had more hits? Pee Wee Reese, with 2,170 to Xander Bogaerts's 1,942.
  • Who drove in more runs? Xander Bogaerts, with 895 to Pee Wee Reese's 885.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Xander Bogaerts, with 12,603 career PIV to Pee Wee Reese's 10,057.
  • Who won more championships? Xander Bogaerts, with 2 World Series titles to Pee Wee Reese's 1.
Leads Pee Wee Reese 8 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Xander Bogaerts +2,546
Read the verdict ↓

Xander Bogaerts

Hitter · 2013–present
Games
1,819
Hits
1,942
Home Runs
210
RBI
895
Avg
.283
OPS
.787
View Xander Bogaerts's full profile →

Pee Wee Reese

Hitter · 1940–1958
Games
2,166
Hits
2,170
Home Runs
126
RBI
885
Avg
.269
OPS
.743
View Pee Wee Reese's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Xander Bogaerts and Pee Wee Reese. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 2010s and the 1940s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Xander Bogaerts is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.

Xander Bogaerts vs Pee Wee Reese: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Xander Bogaerts Pee Wee Reese
Games 1,819 Leads: 2,166
At-Bats 6,869 Leads: 8,058
Runs 1,016 Leads: 1,338
Hits 1,942 Leads: 2,170
Doubles Leads: 402 330
Triples 19 Leads: 80
Home Runs Leads: 210 126
RBI Leads: 895 885
Walks 670 Leads: 1,210
Strikeouts not scored 1,379 890
Stolen Bases 148 Leads: 232
Batting Avg Leads: .283 .269
On-Base % .349 Leads: .366
Slugging % Leads: .438 .377
OPS Leads: .787 .743

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Xander Bogaerts leads Pee Wee Reese 12,603 to 10,057 — driven by per-season impact — 969 PIV per season to 629 — rather than by longevity, since Xander Bogaerts played 13 seasons to Pee Wee Reese's 16. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Xander Bogaerts
12,603
Career PIV · 969 per season (13 seasons)
Pee Wee Reese
10,057
Career PIV · 629 per season (16 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Xander Bogaerts — top 3 seasons by OPS

2019.939 OPS33 HR, 117 RBI, .309 avg
2018.883 OPS23 HR, 103 RBI, .288 avg
2021.863 OPS23 HR, 79 RBI, .295 avg

Pee Wee Reese — top 3 seasons by OPS

1954.859 OPS10 HR, 69 RBI, .309 avg
1947.841 OPS12 HR, 73 RBI, .284 avg
1949.806 OPS16 HR, 73 RBI, .279 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Xander Bogaerts leads in home runs, RBI, batting average, and OPS, while Pee Wee Reese owns hits, runs, and stolen bases. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Xander Bogaerts. PIV agrees: Xander Bogaerts grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Xander Bogaerts and Pee Wee Reese careers compare

No season is shared: Pee Wee Reese played 1940–1958, Xander Bogaerts 2013–present. With 1,819 games against 2,166 across 13 and 16 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. At the plate, Xander Bogaerts struck out more than walked (1,379 to 670), while Pee Wee Reese walked more often than struck out (1,210 walks, 890 strikeouts). Home runs make up a larger share of Xander Bogaerts's hits: 210 of 1,942 for Xander Bogaerts, 126 of 2,170 for Pee Wee Reese. Pee Wee Reese was the more frequent base stealer relative to games played. In slugging percentage, Xander Bogaerts holds the edge, .438 to .377. Because Xander Bogaerts is still playing, the totals above will keep moving through the season.

Xander Bogaerts vs Pee Wee Reese: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Xander Bogaerts or Pee Wee Reese?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Pee Wee Reese leads Xander Bogaerts in 8 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Xander Bogaerts or Pee Wee Reese hit more home runs?
Xander Bogaerts, with 210 to Pee Wee Reese's 126.
Who had the higher OPS?
Xander Bogaerts, with .787 to Pee Wee Reese's .743.
Who had the higher batting average?
Xander Bogaerts, with .283 to Pee Wee Reese's .269.
Who had more hits?
Pee Wee Reese, with 2,170 to Xander Bogaerts's 1,942.