Jim Bunning vs Walter Johnson: Career Stats Comparison
Walter Johnson has the better career line of the two, leading 11 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Jim Bunning played 1955–1971 as a pitcher; Walter Johnson played 1907–1927 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Jim Bunning (1955–1971) and Walter Johnson (1907–1927) — breaking in during the 1950s and the 1900s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Jim Bunning finished with 224 wins and 2,855 strikeouts; Walter Johnson finished with 417 wins and 3,509 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Walter Johnson, with 2.17 to Jim Bunning's 3.27.
- Who won more games? Walter Johnson, with 417 to Jim Bunning's 224.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Walter Johnson, with 3,509 to Jim Bunning's 2,855.
- Who had the better WHIP? Walter Johnson, with 1.06 to Jim Bunning's 1.18.
- Who pitched more innings? Walter Johnson, with 5,914.2 to Jim Bunning's 3,760.1.
- Who threw more shutouts? Walter Johnson, with 110 to Jim Bunning's 40.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Walter Johnson, with 124,021 career Pitcher PIV to Jim Bunning's 44,929.
Jim Bunning
Walter Johnson
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1950s and the 1900s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Jim Bunning | Walter Johnson |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 224 | Leads: 417 |
| Losses not scored | 184 | 279 |
| Games | 591 | Leads: 802 |
| Games Started | 519 | Leads: 666 |
| Complete Games | 151 | Leads: 531 |
| Shutouts | 40 | Leads: 110 |
| Saves | 16 | Leads: 34 |
| Strikeouts | 2,855 | Leads: 3,509 |
| Walks not scored | 1,000 | 1,363 |
| Hits Allowed not scored | 3,433 | 4,913 |
| Home Runs Allowed not scored | 372 | 97 |
| Innings Pitched | 3,760.1 | Leads: 5,914.2 |
| ERA | 3.27 | Leads: 2.17 |
| WHIP | 1.18 | Leads: 1.06 |
| K/9 | Leads: 6.83 | 5.34 |
| BB/9 | 2.39 | Leads: 2.07 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Walter Johnson outpaces Jim Bunning 124,021 to 44,929 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 5,906 PIV per season to 2,496, across 21 seasons to 18. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Jim Bunning — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Walter Johnson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Walter Johnson leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Jim Bunning owns K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Walter Johnson. PIV agrees: Walter Johnson grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the Jim Bunning and Walter Johnson careers compare
The two careers never overlapped: Walter Johnson's ended in 1927, and Jim Bunning debuted in 1955. With 591 games against 802 across 18 and 21 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. Where Jim Bunning comes out ahead, it is in strikeouts per nine (6.83 to 5.34). The per-nine rows read 6.83 strikeouts and 2.39 walks for Jim Bunning, 5.34 and 2.07 for Walter Johnson. Both had the same role: Jim Bunning was mainly a starter (519 starts in 591 games); Walter Johnson was mainly a starter (666 starts in 802 games). Complete games (151 to 531) show how differently the two eras used starters.
Jim Bunning vs Walter Johnson: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Jim Bunning or Walter Johnson?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Walter Johnson leads Jim Bunning in 11 of the 12 scored categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Walter Johnson, with 2.17 to Jim Bunning's 3.27.
- Who won more games?
- Walter Johnson, with 417 to Jim Bunning's 224.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Walter Johnson, with 3,509 to Jim Bunning's 2,855.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Walter Johnson, with 1.06 to Jim Bunning's 1.18.