Jesse Burkett vs Fred Clarke: Career Stats Comparison
Jesse Burkett has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 14 statistical categories compared on this page. Jesse Burkett played 1890–1905 as a hitter; Fred Clarke played 1894–1915 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Jesse Burkett (1890–1905) and Fred Clarke (1894–1915) — both broke in during the 1890s, which makes the head-to-head feel like a contemporaries' debate. Jesse Burkett finished with 2,850 hits and 75 home runs; Fred Clarke finished with 2,678 hits and 67 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Jesse Burkett, with 75 to Fred Clarke's 67.
- Who had the higher OPS? Jesse Burkett, with .861 to Fred Clarke's .814.
- Who had the higher batting average? Jesse Burkett, with .338 to Fred Clarke's .312.
- Who had more hits? Jesse Burkett, with 2,850 to Fred Clarke's 2,678.
- Who drove in more runs? Fred Clarke, with 1,015 to Jesse Burkett's 952.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Jesse Burkett, with 42,233 career PIV to Fred Clarke's 34,764.
- Who won more championships? Fred Clarke, with 1 World Series title to Jesse Burkett's 0.
Jesse Burkett
Fred Clarke
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Jesse Burkett and Fred Clarke. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted -- a .305 in 1965 and a .298 in 2001 came out of very different run environments -- so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Jesse Burkett | Fred Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 2,067 | Leads: 2,246 |
| At-Bats | 8,426 | Leads: 8,584 |
| Runs | Leads: 1,720 | 1,622 |
| Hits | Leads: 2,850 | 2,678 |
| Doubles | 320 | Leads: 361 |
| Triples | 182 | Leads: 220 |
| Home Runs | Leads: 75 | 67 |
| RBI | 952 | Leads: 1,015 |
| Walks | Leads: 1,029 | 875 |
| Strikeouts | 613 | 511 |
| Stolen Bases | 389 | Leads: 509 |
| Batting Avg | Leads: .338 | .312 |
| On-Base % | Leads: .415 | .386 |
| Slugging % | Leads: .446 | .429 |
| OPS | Leads: .861 | .814 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Jesse Burkett leads Fred Clarke 42,233 to 34,764 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (2,640 vs 1,655 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Jesse Burkett — top 3 seasons by OPS
Fred Clarke — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Jesse Burkett leads in hits, home runs, runs, and batting average, while Fred Clarke owns RBI and stolen bases. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Jesse Burkett. PIV agrees: Jesse Burkett grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Jesse Burkett vs Fred Clarke: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Jesse Burkett or Fred Clarke?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Jesse Burkett leads Fred Clarke in 8 of 14 categories.
- Did Jesse Burkett or Fred Clarke hit more home runs?
- Jesse Burkett, with 75 to Fred Clarke's 67.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Jesse Burkett, with .861 to Fred Clarke's .814.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Jesse Burkett, with .338 to Fred Clarke's .312.
- Who had more hits?
- Jesse Burkett, with 2,850 to Fred Clarke's 2,678.