Jesse Burkett vs Elmer Flick: Career Stats Comparison
Jesse Burkett has the better career line of the two, leading 14 of the 14 statistical categories compared on this page. Jesse Burkett played 1890–1905 as a hitter; Elmer Flick played 1898–1910 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Jesse Burkett (1890–1905) and Elmer Flick (1898–1910) — both broke in during the 1890s, which makes the head-to-head feel like a contemporaries' debate. Jesse Burkett finished with 2,850 hits and 75 home runs; Elmer Flick finished with 1,752 hits and 48 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Jesse Burkett, with 75 to Elmer Flick's 48.
- Who had the higher OPS? Jesse Burkett, with .861 to Elmer Flick's .834.
- Who had the higher batting average? Jesse Burkett, with .338 to Elmer Flick's .313.
- Who had more hits? Jesse Burkett, with 2,850 to Elmer Flick's 1,752.
- Who drove in more runs? Jesse Burkett, with 952 to Elmer Flick's 756.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Jesse Burkett, with 42,233 career PIV to Elmer Flick's 29,192.
Jesse Burkett
Elmer Flick
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Jesse Burkett and Elmer Flick. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted -- a .305 in 1965 and a .298 in 2001 came out of very different run environments -- so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Jesse Burkett | Elmer Flick |
|---|---|---|
| Games | Leads: 2,067 | 1,483 |
| At-Bats | Leads: 8,426 | 5,597 |
| Runs | Leads: 1,720 | 950 |
| Hits | Leads: 2,850 | 1,752 |
| Doubles | Leads: 320 | 268 |
| Triples | Leads: 182 | 164 |
| Home Runs | Leads: 75 | 48 |
| RBI | Leads: 952 | 756 |
| Walks | Leads: 1,029 | 597 |
| Strikeouts | 613 | 567 |
| Stolen Bases | Leads: 389 | 330 |
| Batting Avg | Leads: .338 | .313 |
| On-Base % | Leads: .415 | .389 |
| Slugging % | Leads: .446 | .445 |
| OPS | Leads: .861 | .834 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Jesse Burkett outpaces Elmer Flick 42,233 to 29,192 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (2,640 vs 2,085 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Jesse Burkett — top 3 seasons by OPS
Elmer Flick — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Jesse Burkett leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Elmer Flick owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Jesse Burkett. PIV agrees: Jesse Burkett grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Jesse Burkett vs Elmer Flick: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Jesse Burkett or Elmer Flick?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Jesse Burkett leads Elmer Flick in 14 of 14 categories.
- Did Jesse Burkett or Elmer Flick hit more home runs?
- Jesse Burkett, with 75 to Elmer Flick's 48.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Jesse Burkett, with .861 to Elmer Flick's .834.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Jesse Burkett, with .338 to Elmer Flick's .313.
- Who had more hits?
- Jesse Burkett, with 2,850 to Elmer Flick's 1,752.