Jesse Burkett vs Elmer Flick: Career Stats Comparison
Jesse Burkett (1890–1905) and Elmer Flick (1898–1910) — both broke in during the 1890s, which makes the head-to-head feel like a contemporaries' debate. Jesse Burkett finished with 2,850 hits and 75 home runs; Elmer Flick finished with 1,752 hits and 48 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Jesse Burkett
Elmer Flick
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Jesse Burkett and Elmer Flick. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity; the rate stats at the bottom are era-agnostic.
| Statistic | Jesse Burkett | Elmer Flick |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 2,067 | 1,483 |
| At-Bats | 8,426 | 5,597 |
| Runs | 1,720 | 950 |
| Hits | 2,850 | 1,752 |
| Doubles | 320 | 268 |
| Triples | 182 | 164 |
| Home Runs | 75 | 48 |
| RBI | 952 | 756 |
| Walks | 1,029 | 597 |
| Strikeouts | 613 | 567 |
| Stolen Bases | 389 | 330 |
| Batting Avg | .338 | .313 |
| On-Base % | .415 | .389 |
| Slugging % | .446 | .445 |
| OPS | .861 | .834 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Jesse Burkett outpaces Elmer Flick 42,233 to 29,192 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (2,640 vs 2,085 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Jesse Burkett — top 3 seasons by OPS
Elmer Flick — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Jesse Burkett leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Elmer Flick owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Jesse Burkett. PIV agrees: Jesse Burkett grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.