Corbin Burnes vs Jim Palmer: Career Stats Comparison

Jim Palmer has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Corbin Burnes has played 2018–present as a pitcher; Jim Palmer played 1965–1984 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Corbin Burnes (2018–present) and Jim Palmer (1965–1984) — breaking in during the 2010s and the 1960s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Corbin Burnes has 63 wins and 1,122 strikeouts through October 12, 2026; Jim Palmer finished with 268 wins and 2,212 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Jim Palmer, with 2.86 to Corbin Burnes's 3.20.
  • Who won more games? Jim Palmer, with 268 to Corbin Burnes's 63.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Jim Palmer, with 2,212 to Corbin Burnes's 1,122.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Corbin Burnes, with 1.08 to Jim Palmer's 1.18.
  • Who pitched more innings? Jim Palmer, with 3,948.0 to Corbin Burnes's 978.1.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Jim Palmer, with 53 to Corbin Burnes's 0.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Corbin Burnes, with 23,443 career Pitcher PIV to Jim Palmer's 19,502.
Leads Jim Palmer 9 of 12 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Corbin Burnes +3,942
Read the verdict ↓

Corbin Burnes

Pitcher · 2018–present
Wins
63
Losses
38
Strikeouts
1,122
ERA
3.20
WHIP
1.08
IP
978.1
View Corbin Burnes's full profile →

Jim Palmer

Pitcher · 1965–1984
Wins
268
Losses
152
Strikeouts
2,212
ERA
2.86
WHIP
1.18
IP
3,948.0
View Jim Palmer's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 2010s and the 1960s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Corbin Burnes is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.

Corbin Burnes vs Jim Palmer: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Corbin Burnes Jim Palmer
Wins 63 Leads: 268
Losses not scored 38 152
Games 213 Leads: 558
Games Started 152 Leads: 521
Complete Games 0 Leads: 211
Shutouts 0 Leads: 53
Saves 2 Leads: 4
Strikeouts 1,122 Leads: 2,212
Walks not scored 284 1,311
Hits Allowed not scored 768 3,349
Home Runs Allowed not scored 109 303
Innings Pitched 978.1 Leads: 3,948.0
ERA 3.20 Leads: 2.86
WHIP Leads: 1.08 1.18
K/9 Leads: 10.32 5.04
BB/9 Leads: 2.61 2.99

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Corbin Burnes leads Jim Palmer 23,443 to 19,502 — driven by per-season impact — 2,930 PIV per season to 1,026 — rather than by longevity, since Corbin Burnes played 8 seasons to Jim Palmer's 19. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Corbin Burnes
23,443
Career Pitcher PIV · 2,930 per season (8 seasons)
Jim Palmer
19,502
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,026 per season (19 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Corbin Burnes — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20212.43 ERA11-5, 234 K in 167 IP
20242.92 ERA15-9, 181 K in 194 IP
20222.94 ERA12-8, 243 K in 202 IP

Jim Palmer — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19722.07 ERA21-10, 184 K in 274 IP
19752.09 ERA23-11, 193 K in 323 IP
19692.34 ERA16-4, 123 K in 181 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Jim Palmer leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and innings pitched, while Corbin Burnes owns WHIP and K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Jim Palmer. Note that PIV actually grades Corbin Burnes ahead, which means Jim Palmer's edge is partly volume. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Corbin Burnes and Jim Palmer careers compare

No season is shared: Jim Palmer played 1965–1984, Corbin Burnes 2018–present. The table compares 213 games of Corbin Burnes with 558 of Jim Palmer across 8 and 19 PIV seasons; totals favor the longer career by default. Corbin Burnes's edges on the table are WHIP (1.08 to 1.18), strikeouts per nine (10.32 to 5.04), and walks per nine (2.61 to 2.99). By rate, Corbin Burnes struck out 10.32 and walked 2.61 per nine innings; Jim Palmer struck out 5.04 and walked 2.99. Corbin Burnes was mainly a starter (152 starts in 213 games), and Jim Palmer was mainly a starter (521 starts in 558 games). Corbin Burnes's numbers are live and update with each game, so the comparison is a snapshot.

Corbin Burnes vs Jim Palmer: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Corbin Burnes or Jim Palmer?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Jim Palmer leads Corbin Burnes in 9 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Jim Palmer, with 2.86 to Corbin Burnes's 3.20.
Who won more games?
Jim Palmer, with 268 to Corbin Burnes's 63.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Jim Palmer, with 2,212 to Corbin Burnes's 1,122.
Who had the better WHIP?
Corbin Burnes, with 1.08 to Jim Palmer's 1.18.