Fred Clarke vs Elmer Flick: Career Stats Comparison

Fred Clarke has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 12 scored categories on this page (3 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Fred Clarke played 1894–1915 as a hitter; Elmer Flick played 1898–1910 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Fred Clarke (1894–1915) and Elmer Flick (1898–1910) — both debuted in the 1890s. Fred Clarke finished with 2,678 hits and 67 home runs; Elmer Flick finished with 1,752 hits and 48 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who leads the career comparison? Fred Clarke, in 8 of the 12 scored categories.
  • Who hit more home runs? Fred Clarke, with 67 to Elmer Flick's 48.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Elmer Flick, with .834 to Fred Clarke's .814.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Elmer Flick, with .313 to Fred Clarke's .312.
  • Who had more hits? Fred Clarke, with 2,678 to Elmer Flick's 1,752.
  • Who drove in more runs? Fred Clarke, with 1,015 to Elmer Flick's 756.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Fred Clarke, with 34,764 career PIV to Elmer Flick's 29,192.
Leads Fred Clarke 8 of 12 scored categories
PIV edge Fred Clarke +5,571
Read the verdict ↓

Fred Clarke

Hitter · 1894–1915
Games
2,246
Hits
2,678
Home Runs
67
RBI
1,015
Avg
.312
OPS
.814
View Fred Clarke's full profile →

Elmer Flick

Hitter · 1898–1910
Games
1,483
Hits
1,752
Home Runs
48
RBI
756
Avg
.313
OPS
.834
View Elmer Flick's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Fred Clarke and Elmer Flick. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 12 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other 3 are shown but not scored. Games and at-bats measure playing time, strikeouts accumulate with a longer career, and a line where both players are at zero was won by neither, so those are left unmarked. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Fred Clarke vs Elmer Flick: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Fred Clarke Elmer Flick
Games not scored 2,246 1,483
At-Bats not scored 8,584 5,597
Runs Leads: 1,622 950
Hits Leads: 2,678 1,752
Doubles Leads: 361 268
Triples Leads: 220 164
Home Runs Leads: 67 48
RBI Leads: 1,015 756
Walks Leads: 875 597
Strikeouts not scored 511 567
Stolen Bases Leads: 509 330
Batting Avg .312 Leads: .313
On-Base % .386 Leads: .389
Slugging % .429 Leads: .445
OPS .814 Leads: .834

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Fred Clarke leads Elmer Flick 34,764 to 29,192 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: Fred Clarke played 21 seasons to Elmer Flick's 13, while Elmer Flick carries the higher per-season figure (2,246 to 1,655). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

Fred Clarke
34,764
Career PIV · 1,655 per season (21 seasons)
Elmer Flick
29,192
Career PIV · 2,246 per season (13 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Fred Clarke — top 3 seasons by OPS

1897.992 OPS6 HR, 67 RBI, .390 avg
1903.946 OPS5 HR, 70 RBI, .351 avg
1911.900 OPS5 HR, 49 RBI, .324 avg

Elmer Flick — top 3 seasons by OPS

1900.986 OPS11 HR, 110 RBI, .367 avg
1901.899 OPS8 HR, 88 RBI, .333 avg
1898.878 OPS8 HR, 81 RBI, .302 avg

Verdict

Fred Clarke leads 8 of the 12 scored categories on the head-to-head card: runs, hits, doubles, triples, and others. Elmer Flick leads 4: batting average, on-base percentage, slugging percentage, and OPS. On the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Fred Clarke. PIV agrees: Fred Clarke grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Fred Clarke and Elmer Flick careers compare

From 1898 through 1910, Fred Clarke and Elmer Flick were in the majors together. Playing time explains much of the gap in the counting rows: Fred Clarke appeared in 2,246 games to Elmer Flick's 1,483. Where Elmer Flick comes out ahead, it is in batting average (.313 to .312), on-base percentage (.389 to .386), and slugging percentage (.445 to .429). At the plate, Fred Clarke walked more often than struck out (875 walks, 511 strikeouts), and Elmer Flick walked more often than struck out (597 walks, 567 strikeouts). On the bases, Fred Clarke stole more often per game played (509 steals in 2,246 games for Fred Clarke, 330 in 1,483 for Elmer Flick).

Fred Clarke vs Elmer Flick: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Fred Clarke or Elmer Flick?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Fred Clarke leads Elmer Flick in 8 of the 12 scored categories.
Did Fred Clarke or Elmer Flick hit more home runs?
Fred Clarke, with 67 to Elmer Flick's 48.
Who had the higher OPS?
Elmer Flick, with .834 to Fred Clarke's .814.
Who had the higher batting average?
Elmer Flick, with .313 to Fred Clarke's .312.
Who had more hits?
Fred Clarke, with 2,678 to Elmer Flick's 1,752.