Gene Conley vs Hal Newhouser: Career Stats Comparison
Hal Newhouser has the better career line of the two, leading 11 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Gene Conley played 1952–1963 as a pitcher; Hal Newhouser played 1939–1955 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Gene Conley (1952–1963) and Hal Newhouser (1939–1955) — breaking in during the 1950s and the 1930s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Gene Conley finished with 91 wins and 888 strikeouts; Hal Newhouser finished with 207 wins and 1,796 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Hal Newhouser, with 3.06 to Gene Conley's 3.82.
- Who won more games? Hal Newhouser, with 207 to Gene Conley's 91.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Hal Newhouser, with 1,796 to Gene Conley's 888.
- Who had the better WHIP? Hal Newhouser, with 1.31 to Gene Conley's 1.33.
- Who pitched more innings? Hal Newhouser, with 2,993.0 to Gene Conley's 1,588.2.
- Who threw more shutouts? Hal Newhouser, with 33 to Gene Conley's 13.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Hal Newhouser, with 43,492 career Pitcher PIV to Gene Conley's 7,994.
Gene Conley
Hal Newhouser
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1950s and the 1930s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Gene Conley | Hal Newhouser |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 91 | Leads: 207 |
| Losses not scored | 96 | 150 |
| Games | 276 | Leads: 488 |
| Games Started | 214 | Leads: 374 |
| Complete Games | 69 | Leads: 212 |
| Shutouts | 13 | Leads: 33 |
| Saves | 9 | Leads: 26 |
| Strikeouts | 888 | Leads: 1,796 |
| Walks not scored | 511 | 1,249 |
| Hits Allowed not scored | 1,606 | 2,674 |
| Home Runs Allowed not scored | 162 | 137 |
| Innings Pitched | 1,588.2 | Leads: 2,993.0 |
| ERA | 3.82 | Leads: 3.06 |
| WHIP | 1.33 | Leads: 1.31 |
| K/9 | 5.03 | Leads: 5.40 |
| BB/9 | Leads: 2.89 | 3.76 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Hal Newhouser outpaces Gene Conley 43,492 to 7,994 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 2,558 PIV per season to 727, across 17 seasons to 11. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Gene Conley — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Hal Newhouser — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Hal Newhouser leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Gene Conley owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Hal Newhouser. PIV agrees: Hal Newhouser grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the Gene Conley and Hal Newhouser careers compare
The careers of Gene Conley (1952–1963) and Hal Newhouser (1939–1955) overlapped from 1952 to 1955, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. The table compares 276 games of Gene Conley with 488 of Hal Newhouser across 11 and 17 PIV seasons; totals favor the longer career by default. The green cells for Gene Conley are walks per nine (2.89 to 3.76). By rate, Gene Conley struck out 5.03 and walked 2.89 per nine innings; Hal Newhouser struck out 5.40 and walked 3.76. Gene Conley was mainly a starter (214 starts in 276 games), and Hal Newhouser was mainly a starter (374 starts in 488 games).
Gene Conley vs Hal Newhouser: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Gene Conley or Hal Newhouser?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Hal Newhouser leads Gene Conley in 11 of the 12 scored categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Hal Newhouser, with 3.06 to Gene Conley's 3.82.
- Who won more games?
- Hal Newhouser, with 207 to Gene Conley's 91.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Hal Newhouser, with 1,796 to Gene Conley's 888.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Hal Newhouser, with 1.31 to Gene Conley's 1.33.