Francisco Cordero vs Craig Kimbrel: Career Stats Comparison

Craig Kimbrel has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Francisco Cordero played 1999–2012 as a pitcher; Craig Kimbrel has played 2010–present as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Francisco Cordero (1999–2012) and Craig Kimbrel (2010–present) — breaking in during the 1990s and the 2010s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Francisco Cordero finished with 47 wins and 796 strikeouts; Craig Kimbrel has 57 wins and 1,322 strikeouts through October 12, 2026. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Craig Kimbrel, with 2.69 to Francisco Cordero's 3.38.
  • Who won more games? Craig Kimbrel, with 57 to Francisco Cordero's 47.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Craig Kimbrel, with 1,322 to Francisco Cordero's 796.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Craig Kimbrel, with 1.04 to Francisco Cordero's 1.37.
  • Who pitched more innings? Craig Kimbrel, with 867.2 to Francisco Cordero's 824.2.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Neither — both are at 0.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Craig Kimbrel, with 30,862 career Pitcher PIV to Francisco Cordero's 15,835.
Leads Craig Kimbrel 9 of 12 scored categories (3 tied)
Pitcher PIV edge Craig Kimbrel +15,027
Read the verdict ↓

Francisco Cordero

Pitcher · 1999–2012
Wins
47
Losses
53
Strikeouts
796
ERA
3.38
WHIP
1.37
IP
824.2
View Francisco Cordero's full profile →

Craig Kimbrel

Pitcher · 2010–present
Wins
57
Losses
53
Strikeouts
1,322
ERA
2.69
WHIP
1.04
IP
867.2
View Craig Kimbrel's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1990s and the 2010s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Craig Kimbrel is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.

Francisco Cordero vs Craig Kimbrel: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Francisco Cordero Craig Kimbrel
Wins 47 Leads: 57
Losses not scored 53 53
Games 800 Leads: 897
Games Started 0 0
Complete Games 0 0
Shutouts 0 0
Saves 329 Leads: 441
Strikeouts 796 Leads: 1,322
Walks not scored 375 368
Hits Allowed not scored 751 532
Home Runs Allowed not scored 64 79
Innings Pitched 824.2 Leads: 867.2
ERA 3.38 Leads: 2.69
WHIP 1.37 Leads: 1.04
K/9 8.69 Leads: 13.71
BB/9 4.09 Leads: 3.82

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Craig Kimbrel outpaces Francisco Cordero 30,862 to 15,835 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 1,715 PIV per season to 990, across 18 seasons to 16. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Francisco Cordero
15,835
Career Pitcher PIV · 990 per season (16 seasons)
Craig Kimbrel
30,862
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,715 per season (18 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Francisco Cordero

No seasons meet the qualifying workload, so there is no peak-season list to show.

Craig Kimbrel

No seasons meet the qualifying workload, so there is no peak-season list to show.

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Craig Kimbrel leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Francisco Cordero owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Craig Kimbrel. PIV agrees: Craig Kimbrel grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Francisco Cordero and Craig Kimbrel careers compare

The careers of Francisco Cordero (1999–2012) and Craig Kimbrel (2010–present) overlapped from 2010 to 2012, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. With 800 games against 897 across 16 and 18 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. Craig Kimbrel leads every scored row of the table. By rate, Francisco Cordero struck out 8.69 and walked 4.09 per nine innings; Craig Kimbrel struck out 13.71 and walked 3.82. Francisco Cordero worked mostly in relief (0 starts in 800 games, 329 saves), and Craig Kimbrel worked mostly in relief (0 starts in 897 games, 441 saves). Craig Kimbrel allowed fewer baserunners, a 1.04 WHIP to Francisco Cordero's 1.37. Craig Kimbrel's numbers are live and update with each game, so the comparison is a snapshot.

Francisco Cordero vs Craig Kimbrel: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Francisco Cordero or Craig Kimbrel?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Craig Kimbrel leads Francisco Cordero in 9 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Craig Kimbrel, with 2.69 to Francisco Cordero's 3.38.
Who won more games?
Craig Kimbrel, with 57 to Francisco Cordero's 47.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Craig Kimbrel, with 1,322 to Francisco Cordero's 796.
Who had the better WHIP?
Craig Kimbrel, with 1.04 to Francisco Cordero's 1.37.