Jacob deGrom vs Scott Kazmir: Career Stats Comparison

Jacob deGrom has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Jacob deGrom has played 2014–present as a pitcher; Scott Kazmir played 2004–2021 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Jacob deGrom (2014–present) and Scott Kazmir (2004–2021) — breaking in during the 2010s and the 2000s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Jacob deGrom has 107 wins and 2,052 strikeouts through October 12, 2026; Scott Kazmir finished with 108 wins and 1,618 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Jacob deGrom, with 2.73 to Scott Kazmir's 4.02.
  • Who won more games? Scott Kazmir, with 108 to Jacob deGrom's 107.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Jacob deGrom, with 2,052 to Scott Kazmir's 1,618.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Jacob deGrom, with 1.00 to Scott Kazmir's 1.35.
  • Who pitched more innings? Jacob deGrom, with 1,702.1 to Scott Kazmir's 1,701.0.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Jacob deGrom, with 2 to Scott Kazmir's 1.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Jacob deGrom, with 58,656 career Pitcher PIV to Scott Kazmir's 7,832.
Leads Jacob deGrom 8 of 12 scored categories (1 tied)
Pitcher PIV edge Jacob deGrom +50,824
Read the verdict ↓

Jacob deGrom

Pitcher · 2014–present
Wins
107
Losses
76
Strikeouts
2,052
ERA
2.73
WHIP
1.00
IP
1,702.1
View Jacob deGrom's full profile →

Scott Kazmir

Pitcher · 2004–2021
Wins
108
Losses
97
Strikeouts
1,618
ERA
4.02
WHIP
1.35
IP
1,701.0
View Scott Kazmir's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 2010s and the 2000s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Jacob deGrom is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.

Jacob deGrom vs Scott Kazmir: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Jacob deGrom Scott Kazmir
Wins 107 Leads: 108
Losses not scored 76 97
Games 279 Leads: 303
Games Started 279 Leads: 301
Complete Games Leads: 4 3
Shutouts Leads: 2 1
Saves 0 0
Strikeouts Leads: 2,052 1,618
Walks not scored 391 687
Hits Allowed not scored 1,312 1,611
Home Runs Allowed not scored 166 193
Innings Pitched Leads: 1,702.1 1,701.0
ERA Leads: 2.73 4.02
WHIP Leads: 1.00 1.35
K/9 Leads: 10.85 8.56
BB/9 Leads: 2.07 3.63

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Jacob deGrom outpaces Scott Kazmir 58,656 to 7,832 — driven by per-season impact — 4,888 PIV per season to 522 — rather than by longevity, since Jacob deGrom played 12 seasons to Scott Kazmir's 15. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Jacob deGrom
58,656
Career Pitcher PIV · 4,888 per season (12 seasons)
Scott Kazmir
7,832
Career Pitcher PIV · 522 per season (15 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Jacob deGrom — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20181.70 ERA10-9, 269 K in 217 IP
20192.43 ERA11-8, 255 K in 204 IP
20152.54 ERA14-8, 205 K in 191 IP

Scott Kazmir — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20063.24 ERA10-8, 163 K in 144 IP
20073.48 ERA13-9, 239 K in 206 IP
20083.49 ERA12-8, 166 K in 152 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Jacob deGrom leads in strikeouts, ERA, WHIP, and K/9, while Scott Kazmir owns wins. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Jacob deGrom. PIV agrees: Jacob deGrom grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Jacob deGrom and Scott Kazmir careers compare

From 2014 through 2021, Jacob deGrom and Scott Kazmir were in the majors together. The two careers are close in length, 279 games for Jacob deGrom and 303 for Scott Kazmir across 12 and 15 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Scott Kazmir's edges on the table are wins (108 to 107), games (303 to 279), and starts (301 to 279). By rate, Jacob deGrom struck out 10.85 and walked 2.07 per nine innings; Scott Kazmir struck out 8.56 and walked 3.63. Jacob deGrom was mainly a starter (279 starts in 279 games), and Scott Kazmir was mainly a starter (301 starts in 303 games). Because Jacob deGrom is still playing, the totals above will keep moving through the season.

Jacob deGrom vs Scott Kazmir: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Jacob deGrom or Scott Kazmir?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Jacob deGrom leads Scott Kazmir in 8 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Jacob deGrom, with 2.73 to Scott Kazmir's 4.02.
Who won more games?
Scott Kazmir, with 108 to Jacob deGrom's 107.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Jacob deGrom, with 2,052 to Scott Kazmir's 1,618.
Who had the better WHIP?
Jacob deGrom, with 1.00 to Scott Kazmir's 1.35.

See These Players in Another Era