Joe DiMaggio vs Stan Musial: Career Stats Comparison
Stan Musial has the better career line of the two, leading 12 of the 14 statistical categories compared on this page. Joe DiMaggio played 1936–1951 as a hitter; Stan Musial played 1941–1963 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Joe DiMaggio (1936–1951) and Stan Musial (1941–1963) — they broke in during the 1930s and the 1940s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Joe DiMaggio finished with 2,214 hits and 361 home runs; Stan Musial finished with 3,630 hits and 475 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Stan Musial, with 475 to Joe DiMaggio's 361.
- Who had the higher OPS? Joe DiMaggio, with .977 to Stan Musial's .976.
- Who had the higher batting average? Stan Musial, with .331 to Joe DiMaggio's .325.
- Who had more hits? Stan Musial, with 3,630 to Joe DiMaggio's 2,214.
- Who drove in more runs? Stan Musial, with 1,951 to Joe DiMaggio's 1,537.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Stan Musial, with 83,624 career PIV to Joe DiMaggio's 47,427.
- Who won more championships? Joe DiMaggio, with 9 World Series titles to Stan Musial's 3.
Joe DiMaggio
Stan Musial
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Joe DiMaggio and Stan Musial. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted -- a .305 in 1965 and a .298 in 2001 came out of very different run environments -- so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Joe DiMaggio | Stan Musial |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,736 | Leads: 3,026 |
| At-Bats | 6,821 | Leads: 10,972 |
| Runs | 1,390 | Leads: 1,949 |
| Hits | 2,214 | Leads: 3,630 |
| Doubles | 389 | Leads: 725 |
| Triples | 131 | Leads: 177 |
| Home Runs | 361 | Leads: 475 |
| RBI | 1,537 | Leads: 1,951 |
| Walks | 790 | Leads: 1,599 |
| Strikeouts | 369 | 696 |
| Stolen Bases | 30 | Leads: 78 |
| Batting Avg | .325 | Leads: .331 |
| On-Base % | .398 | Leads: .417 |
| Slugging % | Leads: .579 | .559 |
| OPS | Leads: .977 | .976 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Stan Musial outpaces Joe DiMaggio 83,624 to 47,427 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (3,801 vs 3,648 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Joe DiMaggio — top 3 seasons by OPS
Stan Musial — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Stan Musial leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Joe DiMaggio owns OPS. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Stan Musial. PIV agrees: Stan Musial grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Joe DiMaggio vs Stan Musial: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Joe DiMaggio or Stan Musial?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Stan Musial leads Joe DiMaggio in 12 of 14 categories.
- Did Joe DiMaggio or Stan Musial hit more home runs?
- Stan Musial, with 475 to Joe DiMaggio's 361.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Joe DiMaggio, with .977 to Stan Musial's .976.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Stan Musial, with .331 to Joe DiMaggio's .325.
- Who had more hits?
- Stan Musial, with 3,630 to Joe DiMaggio's 2,214.