Jim Edmonds vs Ken Griffey: Career Stats Comparison
Ken Griffey has the better career line of the two, leading 12 of the 14 statistical categories compared on this page. Jim Edmonds played 1993–2010 as a hitter; Ken Griffey played 1989–2010 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Jim Edmonds (1993–2010) and Ken Griffey (1989–2010) — they broke in during the 1990s and the 1980s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Jim Edmonds finished with 1,949 hits and 393 home runs; Ken Griffey finished with 2,781 hits and 630 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Ken Griffey, with 630 to Jim Edmonds's 393.
- Who had the higher OPS? Ken Griffey, with .907 to Jim Edmonds's .903.
- Who had the higher batting average? Neither — both are at .284.
- Who had more hits? Ken Griffey, with 2,781 to Jim Edmonds's 1,949.
- Who drove in more runs? Ken Griffey, with 1,836 to Jim Edmonds's 1,199.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Ken Griffey, with 43,975 career PIV to Jim Edmonds's 28,444.
- Who won more championships? Jim Edmonds, with 1 World Series title to Ken Griffey's 0.
Jim Edmonds
Ken Griffey
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Jim Edmonds and Ken Griffey. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted -- a .305 in 1965 and a .298 in 2001 came out of very different run environments -- so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Jim Edmonds | Ken Griffey |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 2,011 | Leads: 2,671 |
| At-Bats | 6,858 | Leads: 9,801 |
| Runs | 1,251 | Leads: 1,662 |
| Hits | 1,949 | Leads: 2,781 |
| Doubles | 437 | Leads: 524 |
| Triples | 25 | Leads: 38 |
| Home Runs | 393 | Leads: 630 |
| RBI | 1,199 | Leads: 1,836 |
| Walks | 998 | Leads: 1,312 |
| Strikeouts | 1,729 | 1,779 |
| Stolen Bases | 67 | Leads: 184 |
| Batting Avg | Leads: .284 | .284 |
| On-Base % | Leads: .376 | .370 |
| Slugging % | .527 | Leads: .538 |
| OPS | .903 | Leads: .907 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Ken Griffey outpaces Jim Edmonds 43,975 to 28,444 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (1,912 vs 1,497 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Jim Edmonds — top 3 seasons by OPS
Ken Griffey — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Ken Griffey leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Jim Edmonds owns batting average and OBP. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Ken Griffey. PIV agrees: Ken Griffey grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Jim Edmonds vs Ken Griffey: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Jim Edmonds or Ken Griffey?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Ken Griffey leads Jim Edmonds in 12 of 14 categories.
- Did Jim Edmonds or Ken Griffey hit more home runs?
- Ken Griffey, with 630 to Jim Edmonds's 393.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Ken Griffey, with .907 to Jim Edmonds's .903.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Neither — both are at .284.
- Who had more hits?
- Ken Griffey, with 2,781 to Jim Edmonds's 1,949.