Red Faber vs Hippo Vaughn: Career Stats Comparison
Red Faber (1914–1933) and Hippo Vaughn (1908–1921) — breaking in during the 1910s and the 1900s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Red Faber compiled 254 wins and 1,471 strikeouts; Hippo Vaughn put up 178 wins and 1,416 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Red Faber
Hippo Vaughn
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. For pitchers, lower ERA, WHIP, and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads.
| Statistic | Red Faber | Hippo Vaughn |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 254 | 178 |
| Losses | 213 | 137 |
| Games | 669 | 390 |
| Games Started | 483 | 331 |
| Complete Games | 273 | 215 |
| Shutouts | 29 | 41 |
| Saves | 28 | 5 |
| Strikeouts | 1,471 | 1,416 |
| Walks | 1,213 | 817 |
| Hits Allowed | 4,106 | 2,461 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 111 | 39 |
| Innings Pitched | 4,086 | 2,730 |
| ERA | 3.15 | 2.49 |
| WHIP | 1.30 | 1.20 |
| K/9 | 3.24 | 4.67 |
| BB/9 | 2.67 | 2.69 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Hippo Vaughn leads Red Faber 27,688 to 24,538 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (1,978 vs 1,227 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Red Faber — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Hippo Vaughn — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Hippo Vaughn leads in ERA, WHIP, and K/9, while Red Faber owns wins, strikeouts, and innings pitched. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Hippo Vaughn. PIV agrees: Hippo Vaughn grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.