John Franco vs Dan Quisenberry: Career Stats Comparison
John Franco has the better career line of the two, leading 6 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). John Franco played 1984–2005 as a pitcher; Dan Quisenberry played 1979–1990 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
John Franco (1984–2005) and Dan Quisenberry (1979–1990) — breaking in during the 1980s and the 1970s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. John Franco finished with 90 wins and 975 strikeouts; Dan Quisenberry finished with 56 wins and 379 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Dan Quisenberry, with 2.76 to John Franco's 2.89.
- Who won more games? John Franco, with 90 to Dan Quisenberry's 56.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? John Franco, with 975 to Dan Quisenberry's 379.
- Who had the better WHIP? Dan Quisenberry, with 1.18 to John Franco's 1.33.
- Who pitched more innings? John Franco, with 1,245.2 to Dan Quisenberry's 1,043.1.
- Who threw more shutouts? Neither — both are at 0.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? John Franco, with 22,498 career Pitcher PIV to Dan Quisenberry's 16,859.
John Franco
Dan Quisenberry
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1980s and the 1970s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | John Franco | Dan Quisenberry |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | Leads: 90 | 56 |
| Losses not scored | 87 | 46 |
| Games | Leads: 1,119 | 674 |
| Games Started | 0 | 0 |
| Complete Games | 0 | 0 |
| Shutouts | 0 | 0 |
| Saves | Leads: 424 | 244 |
| Strikeouts | Leads: 975 | 379 |
| Walks not scored | 495 | 162 |
| Hits Allowed not scored | 1,166 | 1,064 |
| Home Runs Allowed not scored | 81 | 59 |
| Innings Pitched | Leads: 1,245.2 | 1,043.1 |
| ERA | 2.89 | Leads: 2.76 |
| WHIP | 1.33 | Leads: 1.18 |
| K/9 | Leads: 7.04 | 3.27 |
| BB/9 | 3.58 | Leads: 1.40 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), John Franco outpaces Dan Quisenberry 22,498 to 16,859 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: John Franco played 21 seasons to Dan Quisenberry's 13, while Dan Quisenberry carries the higher per-season figure (1,297 to 1,071). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
John Franco
No seasons meet the qualifying workload, so there is no peak-season list to show.
Dan Quisenberry — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, John Franco leads in wins, strikeouts, K/9, and innings pitched, while Dan Quisenberry owns ERA and WHIP. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to John Franco. PIV agrees: John Franco grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the John Franco and Dan Quisenberry careers compare
The careers of John Franco (1984–2005) and Dan Quisenberry (1979–1990) overlapped from 1984 to 1990, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. Playing time explains much of the gap in the counting rows: John Franco appeared in 1,119 games to Dan Quisenberry's 674. The green cells for Dan Quisenberry are ERA (2.76 to 2.89), WHIP (1.18 to 1.33), and walks per nine (1.40 to 3.58). By rate, John Franco struck out 7.04 and walked 3.58 per nine innings; Dan Quisenberry struck out 3.27 and walked 1.40.
John Franco vs Dan Quisenberry: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, John Franco or Dan Quisenberry?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, John Franco leads Dan Quisenberry in 6 of the 12 scored categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Dan Quisenberry, with 2.76 to John Franco's 2.89.
- Who won more games?
- John Franco, with 90 to Dan Quisenberry's 56.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- John Franco, with 975 to Dan Quisenberry's 379.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Dan Quisenberry, with 1.18 to John Franco's 1.33.