Eric Gagne vs Joe Nathan: Career Stats Comparison

Joe Nathan has the better career line of the two, leading 7 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Eric Gagne played 1999–2008 as a pitcher; Joe Nathan played 1999–2016 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Eric Gagne (1999–2008) and Joe Nathan (1999–2016) — both came up during the 1990s, so the matchup is a direct one. Eric Gagne finished with 33 wins and 718 strikeouts; Joe Nathan finished with 64 wins and 976 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Joe Nathan, with 2.87 to Eric Gagne's 3.47.
  • Who won more games? Joe Nathan, with 64 to Eric Gagne's 33.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Joe Nathan, with 976 to Eric Gagne's 718.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Joe Nathan, with 1.12 to Eric Gagne's 1.16.
  • Who pitched more innings? Joe Nathan, with 923.1 to Eric Gagne's 643.2.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Neither — both are at 0.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Joe Nathan, with 22,319 career Pitcher PIV to Eric Gagne's 14,441.
Leads Joe Nathan 7 of 12 scored categories (2 tied)
Pitcher PIV edge Joe Nathan +7,878
Read the verdict ↓

Eric Gagne

Pitcher · 1999–2008
Wins
33
Losses
26
Strikeouts
718
ERA
3.47
WHIP
1.16
IP
643.2
View Eric Gagne's full profile →

Joe Nathan

Pitcher · 1999–2016
Wins
64
Losses
34
Strikeouts
976
ERA
2.87
WHIP
1.12
IP
923.1
View Joe Nathan's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Eric Gagne vs Joe Nathan: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Eric Gagne Joe Nathan
Wins 33 Leads: 64
Losses not scored 26 34
Games 402 Leads: 787
Games Started Leads: 48 29
Complete Games 0 0
Shutouts 0 0
Saves 187 Leads: 377
Strikeouts 718 Leads: 976
Walks not scored 226 344
Hits Allowed not scored 518 690
Home Runs Allowed not scored 76 84
Innings Pitched 643.2 Leads: 923.1
ERA 3.47 Leads: 2.87
WHIP 1.16 Leads: 1.12
K/9 Leads: 10.04 9.51
BB/9 Leads: 3.16 3.35

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Joe Nathan outpaces Eric Gagne 22,319 to 14,441 — a longevity gap: both average 1,313 PIV per season, and Joe Nathan played 17 seasons to Eric Gagne's 11. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Eric Gagne
14,441
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,313 per season (11 seasons)
Joe Nathan
22,319
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,313 per season (17 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Eric Gagne — top 1 season by ERA (lower is better)

20014.75 ERA6-7, 130 K in 151 IP

Joe Nathan

No seasons meet the qualifying workload, so there is no peak-season list to show.

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Joe Nathan leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Eric Gagne owns K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Joe Nathan. PIV agrees: Joe Nathan grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Eric Gagne and Joe Nathan careers compare

The careers of Eric Gagne (1999–2008) and Joe Nathan (1999–2016) overlapped from 1999 to 2008, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. The table compares 402 games of Eric Gagne with 787 of Joe Nathan across 11 and 17 PIV seasons; totals favor the longer career by default. The green cells for Eric Gagne are starts (48 to 29), strikeouts per nine (10.04 to 9.51), and walks per nine (3.16 to 3.35). The per-nine rows read 10.04 strikeouts and 3.16 walks for Eric Gagne, 9.51 and 3.35 for Joe Nathan.

Eric Gagne vs Joe Nathan: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Eric Gagne or Joe Nathan?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Joe Nathan leads Eric Gagne in 7 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Joe Nathan, with 2.87 to Eric Gagne's 3.47.
Who won more games?
Joe Nathan, with 64 to Eric Gagne's 33.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Joe Nathan, with 976 to Eric Gagne's 718.
Who had the better WHIP?
Joe Nathan, with 1.12 to Eric Gagne's 1.16.