Charlie Gehringer vs Enos Slaughter: Career Stats Comparison

Charlie Gehringer has the better career line of the two, leading 12 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Charlie Gehringer played 1924–1942 as a hitter; Enos Slaughter played 1938–1959 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Charlie Gehringer (1924–1942) and Enos Slaughter (1938–1959) — they broke in during the 1920s and the 1930s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Charlie Gehringer finished with 2,839 hits and 184 home runs; Enos Slaughter finished with 2,383 hits and 169 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Charlie Gehringer, with 184 to Enos Slaughter's 169.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Charlie Gehringer, with .884 to Enos Slaughter's .834.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Charlie Gehringer, with .320 to Enos Slaughter's .300.
  • Who had more hits? Charlie Gehringer, with 2,839 to Enos Slaughter's 2,383.
  • Who drove in more runs? Charlie Gehringer, with 1,427 to Enos Slaughter's 1,304.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Charlie Gehringer, with 39,288 career PIV to Enos Slaughter's 27,340.
  • Who won more championships? Enos Slaughter, with 4 World Series titles to Charlie Gehringer's 1.
Leads Charlie Gehringer 12 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Charlie Gehringer +11,948
Read the verdict ↓

Charlie Gehringer

Hitter · 1924–1942
Games
2,323
Hits
2,839
Home Runs
184
RBI
1,427
Avg
.320
OPS
.884
View Charlie Gehringer's full profile →

Enos Slaughter

Hitter · 1938–1959
Games
2,380
Hits
2,383
Home Runs
169
RBI
1,304
Avg
.300
OPS
.834
View Enos Slaughter's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Charlie Gehringer and Enos Slaughter. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1920s and the 1930s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Charlie Gehringer vs Enos Slaughter: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Charlie Gehringer Enos Slaughter
Games 2,323 Leads: 2,380
At-Bats Leads: 8,860 7,946
Runs Leads: 1,774 1,247
Hits Leads: 2,839 2,383
Doubles Leads: 574 413
Triples 146 Leads: 148
Home Runs Leads: 184 169
RBI Leads: 1,427 1,304
Walks Leads: 1,186 1,018
Strikeouts not scored 372 538
Stolen Bases Leads: 181 71
Batting Avg Leads: .320 .300
On-Base % Leads: .404 .382
Slugging % Leads: .480 .453
OPS Leads: .884 .834

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Charlie Gehringer outpaces Enos Slaughter 39,288 to 27,340 — driven by per-season impact — 2,068 PIV per season to 1,243 — rather than by longevity, since Charlie Gehringer played 19 seasons to Enos Slaughter's 22. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Charlie Gehringer
39,288
Career PIV · 2,068 per season (19 seasons)
Enos Slaughter
27,340
Career PIV · 1,243 per season (22 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Charlie Gehringer — top 3 seasons by OPS

1936.987 OPS15 HR, 116 RBI, .354 avg
1937.978 OPS14 HR, 96 RBI, .371 avg
1939.967 OPS16 HR, 86 RBI, .325 avg

Enos Slaughter — top 3 seasons by OPS

1949.929 OPS13 HR, 96 RBI, .336 avg
1942.906 OPS13 HR, 98 RBI, .318 avg
1941.886 OPS13 HR, 76 RBI, .311 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Charlie Gehringer leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Enos Slaughter owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Charlie Gehringer. PIV agrees: Charlie Gehringer grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Charlie Gehringer and Enos Slaughter careers compare

Charlie Gehringer and Enos Slaughter were active at the same time between 1938 and 1942. With 2,323 games against 2,380 across 19 and 22 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. The green cells for Enos Slaughter are games (2,380 to 2,323) and triples (148 to 146). Charlie Gehringer walked more often than struck out (1,186 walks, 372 strikeouts); Enos Slaughter walked more often than struck out (1,018 walks, 538 strikeouts). On the bases, Charlie Gehringer stole more often per game played (181 steals in 2,323 games for Charlie Gehringer, 71 in 2,380 for Enos Slaughter). Charlie Gehringer's slugging percentage of .480 tops Enos Slaughter's .453.

Charlie Gehringer vs Enos Slaughter: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Charlie Gehringer or Enos Slaughter?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Charlie Gehringer leads Enos Slaughter in 12 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Charlie Gehringer or Enos Slaughter hit more home runs?
Charlie Gehringer, with 184 to Enos Slaughter's 169.
Who had the higher OPS?
Charlie Gehringer, with .884 to Enos Slaughter's .834.
Who had the higher batting average?
Charlie Gehringer, with .320 to Enos Slaughter's .300.
Who had more hits?
Charlie Gehringer, with 2,839 to Enos Slaughter's 2,383.

See These Players in Another Era