Gabby Hartnett vs Babe Ruth: Career Stats Comparison

Babe Ruth has the better career line of the two, leading 14 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Gabby Hartnett played 1922–1941 as a hitter; Babe Ruth played 1914–1935 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Gabby Hartnett (1922–1941) and Babe Ruth (1914–1935) — they broke in during the 1920s and the 1910s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Gabby Hartnett finished with 1,912 hits and 236 home runs; Babe Ruth finished with 2,873 hits and 714 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Babe Ruth, with 714 to Gabby Hartnett's 236.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Babe Ruth, with 1.164 to Gabby Hartnett's .858.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Babe Ruth, with .342 to Gabby Hartnett's .297.
  • Who had more hits? Babe Ruth, with 2,873 to Gabby Hartnett's 1,912.
  • Who drove in more runs? Babe Ruth, with 2,217 to Gabby Hartnett's 1,179.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Babe Ruth, with 111,979 career PIV to Gabby Hartnett's 20,627.
  • Who won more championships? Babe Ruth, with 7 World Series titles to Gabby Hartnett's 0.
Leads Babe Ruth 14 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Babe Ruth +91,352
Read the verdict ↓

Gabby Hartnett

Hitter · 1922–1941
Games
1,990
Hits
1,912
Home Runs
236
RBI
1,179
Avg
.297
OPS
.858
View Gabby Hartnett's full profile →

Babe Ruth

Hitter · 1914–1935
Games
2,503
Hits
2,873
Home Runs
714
RBI
2,217
Avg
.342
OPS
1.164
View Babe Ruth's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Gabby Hartnett and Babe Ruth. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1920s and the 1910s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Gabby Hartnett vs Babe Ruth: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Gabby Hartnett Babe Ruth
Games 1,990 Leads: 2,503
At-Bats 6,432 Leads: 8,398
Runs 867 Leads: 2,174
Hits 1,912 Leads: 2,873
Doubles 396 Leads: 506
Triples 64 Leads: 136
Home Runs 236 Leads: 714
RBI 1,179 Leads: 2,217
Walks 703 Leads: 2,062
Strikeouts not scored 697 1,330
Stolen Bases 28 Leads: 123
Batting Avg .297 Leads: .342
On-Base % .370 Leads: .474
Slugging % .489 Leads: .690
OPS .858 Leads: 1.164

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Babe Ruth outpaces Gabby Hartnett 111,979 to 20,627 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 5,090 PIV per season to 1,031, across 22 seasons to 20. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Gabby Hartnett
20,627
Career PIV · 1,031 per season (20 seasons)
Babe Ruth
111,979
Career PIV · 5,090 per season (22 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Gabby Hartnett — top 3 seasons by OPS

19301.034 OPS37 HR, 122 RBI, .339 avg
1937.971 OPS12 HR, 82 RBI, .354 avg
1935.949 OPS13 HR, 91 RBI, .344 avg

Babe Ruth — top 3 seasons by OPS

19201.382 OPS54 HR, 137 RBI, .376 avg
19211.359 OPS59 HR, 171 RBI, .378 avg
19231.309 OPS41 HR, 131 RBI, .393 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Babe Ruth leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Gabby Hartnett owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Babe Ruth. PIV agrees: Babe Ruth grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Gabby Hartnett and Babe Ruth careers compare

From 1922 through 1935, Gabby Hartnett and Babe Ruth were in the majors together. The two careers are close in length, 1,990 games for Gabby Hartnett and 2,503 for Babe Ruth across 20 and 22 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Babe Ruth leads every scored row of the table. Gabby Hartnett walked more often than struck out (703 walks, 697 strikeouts); Babe Ruth walked more often than struck out (2,062 walks, 1,330 strikeouts). Babe Ruth is the more power-leaning hitter, with 714 of 2,873 hits leaving the park. Babe Ruth was the more frequent base stealer relative to games played. Babe Ruth's slugging percentage of .690 tops Gabby Hartnett's .489.

Gabby Hartnett vs Babe Ruth: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Gabby Hartnett or Babe Ruth?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Babe Ruth leads Gabby Hartnett in 14 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Gabby Hartnett or Babe Ruth hit more home runs?
Babe Ruth, with 714 to Gabby Hartnett's 236.
Who had the higher OPS?
Babe Ruth, with 1.164 to Gabby Hartnett's .858.
Who had the higher batting average?
Babe Ruth, with .342 to Gabby Hartnett's .297.
Who had more hits?
Babe Ruth, with 2,873 to Gabby Hartnett's 1,912.

See These Players in Another Era