Rickey Henderson vs Carl Yastrzemski: Career Stats Comparison
Rickey Henderson (1979–2003) and Carl Yastrzemski (1961–1983) — they broke in during the 1970s and the 1960s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Rickey Henderson finished with 3,055 hits and 297 home runs; Carl Yastrzemski finished with 3,419 hits and 452 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Rickey Henderson
Carl Yastrzemski
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Rickey Henderson and Carl Yastrzemski. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity; the rate stats at the bottom are era-agnostic.
| Statistic | Rickey Henderson | Carl Yastrzemski |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 3,081 | 3,308 |
| At-Bats | 10,961 | 11,988 |
| Runs | 2,295 | 1,816 |
| Hits | 3,055 | 3,419 |
| Doubles | 510 | 646 |
| Triples | 66 | 59 |
| Home Runs | 297 | 452 |
| RBI | 1,115 | 1,844 |
| Walks | 2,190 | 1,845 |
| Strikeouts | 1,694 | 1,393 |
| Stolen Bases | 1,406 | 168 |
| Batting Avg | .279 | .285 |
| On-Base % | .401 | .379 |
| Slugging % | .419 | .462 |
| OPS | .820 | .841 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Carl Yastrzemski outpaces Rickey Henderson 54,310 to 37,642 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (2,361 vs 1,298 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Rickey Henderson — top 3 seasons by OPS
Carl Yastrzemski — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Carl Yastrzemski leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and batting average, while Rickey Henderson owns runs, stolen bases, and OBP. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Carl Yastrzemski. PIV agrees: Carl Yastrzemski grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.