Carl Hubbell vs Clayton Kershaw: Career Stats Comparison

Carl Hubbell has the better career line of the two, leading 7 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Carl Hubbell played 1928–1943 as a pitcher; Clayton Kershaw played 2008–2025 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Carl Hubbell (1928–1943) and Clayton Kershaw (2008–2025) — breaking in during the 1920s and the 2000s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Carl Hubbell finished with 253 wins and 1,677 strikeouts; Clayton Kershaw finished with 223 wins and 3,052 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Clayton Kershaw, with 2.53 to Carl Hubbell's 2.98.
  • Who won more games? Carl Hubbell, with 253 to Clayton Kershaw's 223.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Clayton Kershaw, with 3,052 to Carl Hubbell's 1,677.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Clayton Kershaw, with 1.02 to Carl Hubbell's 1.17.
  • Who pitched more innings? Carl Hubbell, with 3,590.1 to Clayton Kershaw's 2,855.1.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Carl Hubbell, with 36 to Clayton Kershaw's 15.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Clayton Kershaw, with 93,455 career Pitcher PIV to Carl Hubbell's 54,753.
Leads Carl Hubbell 7 of 12 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Clayton Kershaw +38,702
Read the verdict ↓

Carl Hubbell

Pitcher · 1928–1943
Wins
253
Losses
154
Strikeouts
1,677
ERA
2.98
WHIP
1.17
IP
3,590.1
View Carl Hubbell's full profile →

Clayton Kershaw

Pitcher · 2008–2025
Wins
223
Losses
96
Strikeouts
3,052
ERA
2.53
WHIP
1.02
IP
2,855.1
View Clayton Kershaw's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1920s and the 2000s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Carl Hubbell vs Clayton Kershaw: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Carl Hubbell Clayton Kershaw
Wins Leads: 253 223
Losses not scored 154 96
Games Leads: 535 455
Games Started 431 Leads: 451
Complete Games Leads: 260 25
Shutouts Leads: 36 15
Saves Leads: 33 0
Strikeouts 1,677 Leads: 3,052
Walks not scored 725 713
Hits Allowed not scored 3,461 2,193
Home Runs Allowed not scored 227 235
Innings Pitched Leads: 3,590.1 2,855.1
ERA 2.98 Leads: 2.53
WHIP 1.17 Leads: 1.02
K/9 4.20 Leads: 9.62
BB/9 Leads: 1.82 2.25

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Clayton Kershaw outpaces Carl Hubbell 93,455 to 54,753 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 5,192 PIV per season to 3,422, across 18 seasons to 16. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Carl Hubbell
54,753
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,422 per season (16 seasons)
Clayton Kershaw
93,455
Career Pitcher PIV · 5,192 per season (18 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Carl Hubbell — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19331.66 ERA23-12, 156 K in 308 IP
19342.30 ERA21-12, 118 K in 313 IP
19362.31 ERA26-6, 123 K in 304 IP

Clayton Kershaw — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20161.69 ERA12-4, 172 K in 149 IP
20141.77 ERA21-3, 239 K in 198 IP
20131.83 ERA16-9, 232 K in 236 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Clayton Kershaw leads in strikeouts, ERA, WHIP, and K/9, while Carl Hubbell owns wins and innings pitched. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Clayton Kershaw. PIV agrees: Clayton Kershaw grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Carl Hubbell and Clayton Kershaw careers compare

No season is shared: Carl Hubbell played 1928–1943, Clayton Kershaw 2008–2025. With 535 games against 455 across 16 and 18 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. The per-nine rows read 4.20 strikeouts and 1.82 walks for Carl Hubbell, 9.62 and 2.25 for Clayton Kershaw. Carl Hubbell was mainly a starter (431 starts in 535 games), and Clayton Kershaw was mainly a starter (451 starts in 455 games). Complete games (260 to 25) show how differently the two eras used starters. Clayton Kershaw allowed fewer baserunners, a 1.02 WHIP to Carl Hubbell's 1.17.

Carl Hubbell vs Clayton Kershaw: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Carl Hubbell or Clayton Kershaw?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Carl Hubbell leads Clayton Kershaw in 7 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Clayton Kershaw, with 2.53 to Carl Hubbell's 2.98.
Who won more games?
Carl Hubbell, with 253 to Clayton Kershaw's 223.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Clayton Kershaw, with 3,052 to Carl Hubbell's 1,677.
Who had the better WHIP?
Clayton Kershaw, with 1.02 to Carl Hubbell's 1.17.

See These Players in Another Era