Tim Hudson vs Clayton Kershaw: Career Stats Comparison
Clayton Kershaw has the better career line of the two, leading 7 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Tim Hudson played 1999–2015 as a pitcher; Clayton Kershaw played 2008–2025 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Tim Hudson (1999–2015) and Clayton Kershaw (2008–2025) — breaking in during the 1990s and the 2000s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Tim Hudson finished with 222 wins and 2,080 strikeouts; Clayton Kershaw finished with 223 wins and 3,052 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Clayton Kershaw, with 2.53 to Tim Hudson's 3.49.
- Who won more games? Clayton Kershaw, with 223 to Tim Hudson's 222.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Clayton Kershaw, with 3,052 to Tim Hudson's 2,080.
- Who had the better WHIP? Clayton Kershaw, with 1.02 to Tim Hudson's 1.24.
- Who pitched more innings? Tim Hudson, with 3,126.2 to Clayton Kershaw's 2,855.1.
- Who threw more shutouts? Clayton Kershaw, with 15 to Tim Hudson's 13.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Clayton Kershaw, with 93,455 career Pitcher PIV to Tim Hudson's 40,402.
Tim Hudson
Clayton Kershaw
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1990s and the 2000s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Tim Hudson | Clayton Kershaw |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 222 | Leads: 223 |
| Losses not scored | 133 | 96 |
| Games | Leads: 482 | 455 |
| Games Started | Leads: 479 | 451 |
| Complete Games | Leads: 26 | 25 |
| Shutouts | 13 | Leads: 15 |
| Saves | 0 | 0 |
| Strikeouts | 2,080 | Leads: 3,052 |
| Walks not scored | 917 | 713 |
| Hits Allowed not scored | 2,957 | 2,193 |
| Home Runs Allowed not scored | 248 | 235 |
| Innings Pitched | Leads: 3,126.2 | 2,855.1 |
| ERA | 3.49 | Leads: 2.53 |
| WHIP | 1.24 | Leads: 1.02 |
| K/9 | 5.99 | Leads: 9.62 |
| BB/9 | 2.64 | Leads: 2.25 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Clayton Kershaw outpaces Tim Hudson 93,455 to 40,402 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 5,192 PIV per season to 2,377, across 18 seasons to 17. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Tim Hudson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Clayton Kershaw — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Clayton Kershaw leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Tim Hudson owns innings pitched. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Clayton Kershaw. PIV agrees: Clayton Kershaw grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the Tim Hudson and Clayton Kershaw careers compare
From 2008 through 2015, Tim Hudson and Clayton Kershaw were in the majors together. With 482 games against 455 across 17 and 18 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. The green cells for Tim Hudson are games (482 to 455), starts (479 to 451), and complete games (26 to 25). The per-nine rows read 5.99 strikeouts and 2.64 walks for Tim Hudson, 9.62 and 2.25 for Clayton Kershaw. Tim Hudson was mainly a starter (479 starts in 482 games), and Clayton Kershaw was mainly a starter (451 starts in 455 games). In WHIP, Clayton Kershaw's 1.02 beats Tim Hudson's 1.24.
Tim Hudson vs Clayton Kershaw: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Tim Hudson or Clayton Kershaw?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Clayton Kershaw leads Tim Hudson in 7 of the 12 scored categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Clayton Kershaw, with 2.53 to Tim Hudson's 3.49.
- Who won more games?
- Clayton Kershaw, with 223 to Tim Hudson's 222.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Clayton Kershaw, with 3,052 to Tim Hudson's 2,080.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Clayton Kershaw, with 1.02 to Tim Hudson's 1.24.