Tim Hudson vs Derek Lowe: Career Stats Comparison

Tim Hudson has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 8 scored categories on this page (8 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Tim Hudson played 1999–2015 as a pitcher; Derek Lowe played 1997–2013 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Tim Hudson (1999–2015) and Derek Lowe (1997–2013) — both debuted in the 1990s. Tim Hudson finished with 222 wins and 2,080 strikeouts; Derek Lowe finished with 176 wins and 1,722 strikeouts. The table below sets out their careers line by line.

Quick answer

  • Who leads the career comparison? Tim Hudson, in 8 of the 8 scored categories.
  • Who had the better ERA? Tim Hudson, with 3.49 to Derek Lowe's 4.03.
  • Who won more games? Tim Hudson, with 222 to Derek Lowe's 176.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Tim Hudson, with 2,080 to Derek Lowe's 1,722.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Tim Hudson, with 1.24 to Derek Lowe's 1.33.
  • How many innings did each pitch? Tim Hudson 3,126.2, Derek Lowe 2,671.1.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Tim Hudson, with 13 to Derek Lowe's 4.
Leads Tim Hudson 8 of 8 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Tim Hudson +5,280
Read the verdict ↓

Tim Hudson

Pitcher · 1999–2015
Wins
222
Losses
133
Strikeouts
2,080
ERA
3.49
WHIP
1.24
IP
3,126.2
View Tim Hudson's full profile →

Derek Lowe

Pitcher · 1997–2013
Wins
176
Losses
157
Strikeouts
1,722
ERA
4.03
WHIP
1.33
IP
2,671.1
View Derek Lowe's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 8 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 8 are shown but not scored. Games, starts and innings measure playing time, and losses, walks and hits allowed track how long someone pitched, so they are left unmarked, as is any line where both players are at zero. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Tim Hudson vs Derek Lowe: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Tim Hudson Derek Lowe
Wins Leads: 222 176
Losses not scored 133 157
Games not scored 482 681
Games Started not scored 479 377
Complete Games Leads: 26 10
Shutouts Leads: 13 4
Saves not scored 0 86
Strikeouts Leads: 2,080 1,722
Walks not scored 917 794
Hits Allowed not scored 2,957 2,759
Home Runs Allowed not scored 248 217
Innings Pitched not scored 3,126.2 2,671.1
ERA Leads: 3.49 4.03
WHIP Leads: 1.24 1.33
K/9 Leads: 5.99 5.80
BB/9 Leads: 2.64 2.68

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Tim Hudson leads Derek Lowe 40,402 to 35,122 — driven by per-season impact — 2,377 PIV per season to 2,066 — rather than by longevity, since Tim Hudson played 17 seasons to Derek Lowe's 17. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

Tim Hudson
40,402
Career Pitcher PIV · 2,377 per season (17 seasons)
Derek Lowe
35,122
Career Pitcher PIV · 2,066 per season (17 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Tim Hudson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20032.70 ERA16-7, 162 K in 240 IP
20102.83 ERA17-9, 139 K in 228 IP
20022.98 ERA15-9, 152 K in 238 IP

Derek Lowe — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20022.58 ERA21-8, 127 K in 219 IP
20083.24 ERA14-11, 147 K in 211 IP
20053.61 ERA12-15, 146 K in 222 IP

Verdict

Tim Hudson leads 8 of the 8 scored categories on the head-to-head card: wins, complete games, shutouts, strikeouts, and others. Derek Lowe leads 0: no scored category. On the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Tim Hudson. PIV agrees: Tim Hudson grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Tim Hudson and Derek Lowe careers compare

From 1999 through 2013, Tim Hudson and Derek Lowe were in the majors together. The two careers are close in length, 482 games for Tim Hudson and 681 for Derek Lowe across 17 and 17 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Tim Hudson leads every scored row of the table. By rate, Tim Hudson struck out 5.99 and walked 2.64 per nine innings; Derek Lowe struck out 5.80 and walked 2.68. Their roles differ: Tim Hudson was mainly a starter (479 starts in 482 games); Derek Lowe split time between starting and relief (377 starts in 681 games). Tim Hudson allowed fewer baserunners, a 1.24 WHIP to Derek Lowe's 1.33.

Tim Hudson vs Derek Lowe: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Tim Hudson or Derek Lowe?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Tim Hudson leads Derek Lowe in 8 of the 8 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Tim Hudson, with 3.49 to Derek Lowe's 4.03.
Who won more games?
Tim Hudson, with 222 to Derek Lowe's 176.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Tim Hudson, with 2,080 to Derek Lowe's 1,722.
Who had the better WHIP?
Tim Hudson, with 1.24 to Derek Lowe's 1.33.

See These Players in Another Era