Walter Johnson vs Eddie Plank: Career Stats Comparison
Walter Johnson has the better career line of the two, leading 12 of the 12 statistical categories compared on this page. Walter Johnson played 1907–1927 as a pitcher; Eddie Plank played 1901–1917 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Walter Johnson (1907–1927) and Eddie Plank (1901–1917) — both came up during the 1900s, so the matchup is a direct one. Walter Johnson compiled 417 wins and 3,509 strikeouts; Eddie Plank put up 326 wins and 2,246 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Walter Johnson, with 2.17 to Eddie Plank's 2.35.
- Who won more games? Walter Johnson, with 417 to Eddie Plank's 326.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Walter Johnson, with 3,509 to Eddie Plank's 2,246.
- Who had the better WHIP? Walter Johnson, with 1.06 to Eddie Plank's 1.12.
- Who pitched more innings? Walter Johnson, with 5,914 to Eddie Plank's 4,495.
- Who threw more shutouts? Walter Johnson, with 110 to Eddie Plank's 69.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Walter Johnson, with 124,021 career Pitcher PIV to Eddie Plank's 51,914.
Walter Johnson
Eddie Plank
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted: compare them with the era in mind, or use the PIV card below, which is.
| Statistic | Walter Johnson | Eddie Plank |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | Leads: 417 | 326 |
| Losses | 279 | 194 |
| Games | Leads: 802 | 623 |
| Games Started | Leads: 666 | 529 |
| Complete Games | Leads: 531 | 410 |
| Shutouts | Leads: 110 | 69 |
| Saves | Leads: 34 | 23 |
| Strikeouts | Leads: 3,509 | 2,246 |
| Walks | 1,363 | 1,072 |
| Hits Allowed | 4,913 | 3,958 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 97 | 42 |
| Innings Pitched | Leads: 5,914 | 4,495 |
| ERA | Leads: 2.17 | 2.35 |
| WHIP | Leads: 1.06 | 1.12 |
| K/9 | Leads: 5.34 | 4.50 |
| BB/9 | Leads: 2.07 | 2.15 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Walter Johnson outpaces Eddie Plank 124,021 to 51,914 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (5,906 vs 3,054 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Walter Johnson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Eddie Plank — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Walter Johnson leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Eddie Plank owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Walter Johnson. PIV agrees: Walter Johnson grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Walter Johnson vs Eddie Plank: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Walter Johnson or Eddie Plank?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Walter Johnson leads Eddie Plank in 12 of 12 categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Walter Johnson, with 2.17 to Eddie Plank's 2.35.
- Who won more games?
- Walter Johnson, with 417 to Eddie Plank's 326.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Walter Johnson, with 3,509 to Eddie Plank's 2,246.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Walter Johnson, with 1.06 to Eddie Plank's 1.12.