Walter Johnson vs Eddie Plank: Career Stats Comparison

Walter Johnson has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 8 scored categories on this page (8 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Walter Johnson played 1907–1927 as a pitcher; Eddie Plank played 1901–1917 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Walter Johnson (1907–1927) and Eddie Plank (1901–1917) — both debuted in the 1900s. Walter Johnson finished with 417 wins and 3,509 strikeouts; Eddie Plank finished with 326 wins and 2,246 strikeouts. The table below sets out their careers line by line.

Quick answer

  • Who leads the career comparison? Walter Johnson, in 8 of the 8 scored categories.
  • Who had the better ERA? Walter Johnson, with 2.17 to Eddie Plank's 2.35.
  • Who won more games? Walter Johnson, with 417 to Eddie Plank's 326.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Walter Johnson, with 3,509 to Eddie Plank's 2,246.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Walter Johnson, with 1.06 to Eddie Plank's 1.12.
  • How many innings did each pitch? Walter Johnson 5,914.2, Eddie Plank 4,495.2.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Walter Johnson, with 110 to Eddie Plank's 69.
Leads Walter Johnson 8 of 8 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Walter Johnson +72,107
Read the verdict ↓

Walter Johnson

Pitcher · 1907–1927
Wins
417
Losses
279
Strikeouts
3,509
ERA
2.17
WHIP
1.06
IP
5,914.2
View Walter Johnson's full profile →

Eddie Plank

Pitcher · 1901–1917
Wins
326
Losses
194
Strikeouts
2,246
ERA
2.35
WHIP
1.12
IP
4,495.2
View Eddie Plank's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 8 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 8 are shown but not scored. Games, starts and innings measure playing time, and losses, walks and hits allowed track how long someone pitched, so they are left unmarked, as is any line where both players are at zero. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Walter Johnson vs Eddie Plank: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Walter Johnson Eddie Plank
Wins Leads: 417 326
Losses not scored 279 194
Games not scored 802 623
Games Started not scored 666 529
Complete Games Leads: 531 410
Shutouts Leads: 110 69
Saves not scored 34 23
Strikeouts Leads: 3,509 2,246
Walks not scored 1,363 1,072
Hits Allowed not scored 4,913 3,958
Home Runs Allowed not scored 97 42
Innings Pitched not scored 5,914.2 4,495.2
ERA Leads: 2.17 2.35
WHIP Leads: 1.06 1.12
K/9 Leads: 5.34 4.50
BB/9 Leads: 2.07 2.15

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Walter Johnson outpaces Eddie Plank 124,021 to 51,914 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 5,906 PIV per season to 3,054, across 21 seasons to 17. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

Walter Johnson
124,021
Career Pitcher PIV · 5,906 per season (21 seasons)
Eddie Plank
51,914
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,054 per season (17 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Walter Johnson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19131.14 ERA36-7, 243 K in 346 IP
19181.27 ERA23-13, 162 K in 326 IP
19101.36 ERA25-17, 313 K in 370 IP

Eddie Plank — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19091.76 ERA19-10, 132 K in 265 IP
19171.79 ERA5-6, 26 K in 131 IP
19102.01 ERA16-10, 123 K in 250 IP

Verdict

Walter Johnson leads 8 of the 8 scored categories on the head-to-head card: wins, complete games, shutouts, strikeouts, and others. Eddie Plank leads 0: no scored category. On the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Walter Johnson. PIV agrees: Walter Johnson grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Walter Johnson and Eddie Plank careers compare

Walter Johnson and Eddie Plank were active at the same time between 1907 and 1917. The two careers are close in length, 802 games for Walter Johnson and 623 for Eddie Plank across 21 and 17 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Every scored category on the table goes to Walter Johnson. The per-nine rows read 5.34 strikeouts and 2.07 walks for Walter Johnson, 4.50 and 2.15 for Eddie Plank. Walter Johnson was mainly a starter (666 starts in 802 games), and Eddie Plank was mainly a starter (529 starts in 623 games). Walter Johnson allowed fewer baserunners, a 1.06 WHIP to Eddie Plank's 1.12.

Walter Johnson vs Eddie Plank: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Walter Johnson or Eddie Plank?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Walter Johnson leads Eddie Plank in 8 of the 8 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Walter Johnson, with 2.17 to Eddie Plank's 2.35.
Who won more games?
Walter Johnson, with 417 to Eddie Plank's 326.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Walter Johnson, with 3,509 to Eddie Plank's 2,246.
Who had the better WHIP?
Walter Johnson, with 1.06 to Eddie Plank's 1.12.

See These Players in Another Era