Clayton Kershaw vs Tim Lincecum: Career Stats Comparison

Clayton Kershaw (2008–present) and Tim Lincecum (2007–2016) — both came up during the 2000s, so the matchup is a direct one. Clayton Kershaw compiled 223 wins and 3,052 strikeouts; Tim Lincecum put up 110 wins and 1,736 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Clayton Kershaw

Pitcher · 2008–present
Wins
223
Losses
96
Strikeouts
3,052
ERA
2.53
WHIP
1.02
IP
2,855
View Clayton Kershaw's full profile →

Tim Lincecum

Pitcher · 2007–2016
Wins
110
Losses
89
Strikeouts
1,736
ERA
3.74
WHIP
1.29
IP
1,682
View Tim Lincecum's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. For pitchers, lower ERA, WHIP, and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads.

Statistic Clayton Kershaw Tim Lincecum
Wins 223 110
Losses 96 89
Games 455 278
Games Started 451 270
Complete Games 25 10
Shutouts 15 7
Saves 0 1
Strikeouts 3,052 1,736
Walks 713 669
Hits Allowed 2,193 1,506
Home Runs Allowed 235 147
Innings Pitched 2,855 1,682
ERA 2.53 3.74
WHIP 1.02 1.29
K/9 9.62 9.29
BB/9 2.25 3.58

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Clayton Kershaw outpaces Tim Lincecum 93,455 to 28,769 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (5,192 vs 2,877 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

Clayton Kershaw
93,455
Career Pitcher PIV · 5,192 per season (18 seasons)
Tim Lincecum
28,769
Career Pitcher PIV · 2,877 per season (10 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Clayton Kershaw — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20161.69 ERA12-4, 172 K in 149 IP
20141.77 ERA21-3, 239 K in 198 IP
20131.83 ERA16-9, 232 K in 236 IP

Tim Lincecum — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20092.48 ERA15-7, 261 K in 225 IP
20082.62 ERA18-5, 265 K in 227 IP
20112.74 ERA13-14, 220 K in 217 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Clayton Kershaw leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Tim Lincecum owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Clayton Kershaw. PIV agrees: Clayton Kershaw grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

See These Players in Another Era