Clayton Kershaw vs Gaylord Perry: Career Stats Comparison

Gaylord Perry has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Clayton Kershaw played 2008–2025 as a pitcher; Gaylord Perry played 1962–1983 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Clayton Kershaw (2008–2025) and Gaylord Perry (1962–1983) — breaking in during the 2000s and the 1960s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Clayton Kershaw finished with 223 wins and 3,052 strikeouts; Gaylord Perry finished with 314 wins and 3,534 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Clayton Kershaw, with 2.53 to Gaylord Perry's 3.11.
  • Who won more games? Gaylord Perry, with 314 to Clayton Kershaw's 223.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Gaylord Perry, with 3,534 to Clayton Kershaw's 3,052.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Clayton Kershaw, with 1.02 to Gaylord Perry's 1.18.
  • Who pitched more innings? Gaylord Perry, with 5,350.1 to Clayton Kershaw's 2,855.1.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Gaylord Perry, with 53 to Clayton Kershaw's 15.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Clayton Kershaw, with 93,455 career Pitcher PIV to Gaylord Perry's 78,312.
Leads Gaylord Perry 8 of 12 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Clayton Kershaw +15,143
Read the verdict ↓

Clayton Kershaw

Pitcher · 2008–2025
Wins
223
Losses
96
Strikeouts
3,052
ERA
2.53
WHIP
1.02
IP
2,855.1
View Clayton Kershaw's full profile →

Gaylord Perry

Pitcher · 1962–1983
Wins
314
Losses
265
Strikeouts
3,534
ERA
3.11
WHIP
1.18
IP
5,350.1
View Gaylord Perry's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 2000s and the 1960s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Clayton Kershaw vs Gaylord Perry: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Clayton Kershaw Gaylord Perry
Wins 223 Leads: 314
Losses not scored 96 265
Games 455 Leads: 777
Games Started 451 Leads: 690
Complete Games 25 Leads: 303
Shutouts 15 Leads: 53
Saves 0 Leads: 11
Strikeouts 3,052 Leads: 3,534
Walks not scored 713 1,379
Hits Allowed not scored 2,193 4,938
Home Runs Allowed not scored 235 399
Innings Pitched 2,855.1 Leads: 5,350.1
ERA Leads: 2.53 3.11
WHIP Leads: 1.02 1.18
K/9 Leads: 9.62 5.94
BB/9 Leads: 2.25 2.32

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Clayton Kershaw leads Gaylord Perry 93,455 to 78,312 — driven by per-season impact — 5,192 PIV per season to 3,132 — rather than by longevity, since Clayton Kershaw played 18 seasons to Gaylord Perry's 25. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Clayton Kershaw
93,455
Career Pitcher PIV · 5,192 per season (18 seasons)
Gaylord Perry
78,312
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,132 per season (25 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Clayton Kershaw — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20161.69 ERA12-4, 172 K in 149 IP
20141.77 ERA21-3, 239 K in 198 IP
20131.83 ERA16-9, 232 K in 236 IP

Gaylord Perry — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19721.92 ERA24-16, 234 K in 342 IP
19682.44 ERA16-15, 173 K in 291 IP
19692.49 ERA19-14, 233 K in 325 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Clayton Kershaw leads in ERA, WHIP, and K/9, while Gaylord Perry owns wins, strikeouts, and innings pitched. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Clayton Kershaw. PIV agrees: Clayton Kershaw grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Clayton Kershaw and Gaylord Perry careers compare

No season is shared: Gaylord Perry played 1962–1983, Clayton Kershaw 2008–2025. Playing time explains much of the gap in the counting rows: Clayton Kershaw appeared in 455 games to Gaylord Perry's 777. Where Clayton Kershaw comes out ahead, it is in ERA (2.53 to 3.11), WHIP (1.02 to 1.18), and strikeouts per nine (9.62 to 5.94). The per-nine rows read 9.62 strikeouts and 2.25 walks for Clayton Kershaw, 5.94 and 2.32 for Gaylord Perry. Clayton Kershaw was mainly a starter (451 starts in 455 games), and Gaylord Perry was mainly a starter (690 starts in 777 games). Complete games (25 to 303) show how differently the two eras used starters.

Clayton Kershaw vs Gaylord Perry: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Clayton Kershaw or Gaylord Perry?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Gaylord Perry leads Clayton Kershaw in 8 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Clayton Kershaw, with 2.53 to Gaylord Perry's 3.11.
Who won more games?
Gaylord Perry, with 314 to Clayton Kershaw's 223.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Gaylord Perry, with 3,534 to Clayton Kershaw's 3,052.
Who had the better WHIP?
Clayton Kershaw, with 1.02 to Gaylord Perry's 1.18.

See These Players in Another Era