Harmon Killebrew vs Ted Williams: Career Stats Comparison

Ted Williams has the better career line of the two, leading 11 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Harmon Killebrew played 1954–1975 as a hitter; Ted Williams played 1939–1960 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Harmon Killebrew (1954–1975) and Ted Williams (1939–1960) — they broke in during the 1950s and the 1930s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Harmon Killebrew finished with 2,086 hits and 573 home runs; Ted Williams finished with 2,654 hits and 521 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Harmon Killebrew, with 573 to Ted Williams's 521.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Ted Williams, with 1.116 to Harmon Killebrew's .884.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Ted Williams, with .344 to Harmon Killebrew's .256.
  • Who had more hits? Ted Williams, with 2,654 to Harmon Killebrew's 2,086.
  • Who drove in more runs? Ted Williams, with 1,839 to Harmon Killebrew's 1,584.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Ted Williams, with 96,302 career PIV to Harmon Killebrew's 48,240.
Leads Ted Williams 11 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Ted Williams +48,063
Read the verdict ↓

Harmon Killebrew

Hitter · 1954–1975
Games
2,435
Hits
2,086
Home Runs
573
RBI
1,584
Avg
.256
OPS
.884
View Harmon Killebrew's full profile →

Ted Williams

Hitter · 1939–1960
Games
2,292
Hits
2,654
Home Runs
521
RBI
1,839
Avg
.344
OPS
1.116
View Ted Williams's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Harmon Killebrew and Ted Williams. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1950s and the 1930s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Harmon Killebrew vs Ted Williams: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Harmon Killebrew Ted Williams
Games Leads: 2,435 2,292
At-Bats Leads: 8,147 7,706
Runs 1,283 Leads: 1,798
Hits 2,086 Leads: 2,654
Doubles 290 Leads: 525
Triples 24 Leads: 71
Home Runs Leads: 573 521
RBI 1,584 Leads: 1,839
Walks 1,559 Leads: 2,021
Strikeouts not scored 1,699 709
Stolen Bases 19 Leads: 24
Batting Avg .256 Leads: .344
On-Base % .376 Leads: .482
Slugging % .509 Leads: .634
OPS .884 Leads: 1.116

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Ted Williams outpaces Harmon Killebrew 96,302 to 48,240 — driven by per-season impact — 5,069 PIV per season to 2,193 — rather than by longevity, since Ted Williams played 19 seasons to Harmon Killebrew's 22. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Harmon Killebrew
48,240
Career PIV · 2,193 per season (22 seasons)
Ted Williams
96,302
Career PIV · 5,069 per season (19 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Harmon Killebrew — top 3 seasons by OPS

19611.012 OPS46 HR, 122 RBI, .288 avg
19691.011 OPS49 HR, 140 RBI, .276 avg
1967.965 OPS44 HR, 113 RBI, .269 avg

Ted Williams — top 3 seasons by OPS

19411.287 OPS37 HR, 120 RBI, .406 avg
19571.257 OPS38 HR, 87 RBI, .388 avg
19551.200 OPS28 HR, 83 RBI, .356 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Ted Williams leads in hits, RBI, runs, and stolen bases, while Harmon Killebrew owns home runs. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Ted Williams. PIV agrees: Ted Williams grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Harmon Killebrew and Ted Williams careers compare

The careers of Harmon Killebrew (1954–1975) and Ted Williams (1939–1960) overlapped from 1954 to 1960, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. The two careers are close in length, 2,435 games for Harmon Killebrew and 2,292 for Ted Williams across 22 and 19 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. The green cells for Harmon Killebrew are games (2,435 to 2,292), at-bats (8,147 to 7,706), and home runs (573 to 521). Plate discipline differs: Harmon Killebrew struck out more than walked (1,699 to 1,559), but Ted Williams walked more often than struck out (2,021 walks, 709 strikeouts).

Harmon Killebrew vs Ted Williams: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Harmon Killebrew or Ted Williams?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Ted Williams leads Harmon Killebrew in 11 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Harmon Killebrew or Ted Williams hit more home runs?
Harmon Killebrew, with 573 to Ted Williams's 521.
Who had the higher OPS?
Ted Williams, with 1.116 to Harmon Killebrew's .884.
Who had the higher batting average?
Ted Williams, with .344 to Harmon Killebrew's .256.
Who had more hits?
Ted Williams, with 2,654 to Harmon Killebrew's 2,086.

See These Players in Another Era